Balwan Singh, Panipat V. ITO, Ward- 3, Panipat

ITA 415/DEL/2019

AI Insights

The case involved Rashi Wears Pvt. Ltd, the appellant, who filed a miscellaneous application to correct a typographical error in the PAN (Permanent Account Number) as recorded in an earlier tribunal order dated 11.04.2019. The PAN was incorrectly stated as AAATF1445M instead of the correct AAACR4887R. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-15(3), New Delhi, was the respondent. The tribunal acknowledged the mistake and corrected the PAN in their records.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 131737 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 4 year(s) 3 month(s) 13 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 03-05-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 31-07-2023
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 20-01-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHIBENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI Before Sh. Kul Bharat, Judicial Member Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member MA No. 415/Del/2019 (in ITA No. 3155/Del/2016: Asstt. Year: 2011-12) Rashi Wears Pvt. Ltd, D-972, New Friends Colony, New Delhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-15(3), New Delhi (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN No. AAACR4887R Assessee by : Sh. Rahul, CA Revenue by : Sh. Kumar Parnav, Sr. DR Date of Hearing: 17.03.2023 Date of Pronouncement: 04.05.2023 ORDER Per Dr. B. R. R. Kumar, Accountant Member: By way of this Miscellaneous Application the applicant brought to the notice of the Bench regarding the typographical mistake in the order dated 11.04.2019 wherein PAN of the applicant company has been mentioned as AAATF1445M instead of correct PAN i.e. AAACR4887R. The same is hereby corrected. 2. In the result the miscellaneous applications filed by the assessee are allowed. Order Pronounced in the Open Court on 04/05/2023. Sd/- Sd/- (Kul Bharat) (Dr. B. R. R. Kumar) Judicial Member Accountant Member Dated: 04/05/2023 *Ajay Kumar Keot, Sr. PS*