IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH `E NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI A.D. JAIN AND SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA ITA NO. 4162(DEL)2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2004-05 MARKET COMMITTEE, DY .COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TARAORI, DISTT. KARNAL, NEW GRAIN V. I.T. OFFI CE, KARNAL. MARKET, TARAORI, KARNAL. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI R.S. NEGI, SR.DR ORDER PER A.D. JAIN, J.M. THIS IS ASSESSEES APPEAL FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004 -05. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPITE SENDING NOTICE FOR HEARING, WHICH HAS NOT RETURNED UNSERVED. THEREF ORE, CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN MIND THE PROVISIONS OF RULE 19(2) OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320(DEL) , WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UN-ADMITTED. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON- ITA 4162(DEL)2011 2 COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED AB OUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE ASSESSEES APPEAL IS DISMISSE D. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15.11.2011. SD/- SD/- (SHAMIM YAHYA) (A.D. JAIN) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 15.11.2011 *RM COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT. 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR TRUE COPY BY ORDER DEPUTY REGISTRAR .