IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI JASON P. BOAZ, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 433/BANG/2012 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 11(1), BANGALORE. VS. M/S. ADITYA AUTO PRODUCTS & ENGINEERING (I) PVT. LTD., PLOT NO.13-E, KIADB INDUSTRIAL AREA, DODDABALLAPURA, BANGALORE 561 203. PAN: AABCA 7045H APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : DR. P.K. SRIHARI, ADDL. CIT(DR) RESPONDENT BY : NONE DATE OF HEARING : 02.03.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 05.03.2015 O R D E R PER N.V. VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL IS AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 15.12.2011 OF THE CIT(APPEALS)-I, BANGALORE RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YE AR 2008-09. 2. THE ONLY ISSUE THAT ARISES FOR CONSIDERATION IN THIS APPEAL IS AS TO WHETHER THE CIT(APPEALS) WAS JUSTIFIED IN DIRECTING THE AO TO EXCLUDE FREIGHT CHARGES OF RS.2,07,19,006 FROM THE EXPORT T URNOVER, WITHOUT ITA NO. 433/BANG/2012 PAGE 2 OF 3 REDUCING THE SAME FROM THE TOTAL TURNOVER ALSO, WHI LE COMPUTING DEDUCTION U/S. 10B OF THE ACT. 3. ACCORDING TO THE AO, AS PER THE DEFINITION OF EX PORT TURNOVER GIVEN IN CLAUSE (IV) TO EXPLANATION 2, THE EXPENSES INCURRED FOR FREIGHT EXPENSES ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DELIVERY OF THE PRODUCT OR SOFT WARE OUTSIDE INDIA SHOULD BE REDUCED FROM THE EXPORT TURNOVER. HOWEVER, THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 10B DO NOT PROVIDE FOR EXCLUSION OF SUCH EXPENDITUR E FROM TOTAL TURNOVER. IN THE ABSENCE OF A DEFINITION FOR TOTAL TURNOVER IN S ECTION 10B, THE NORMAL DEFINITION OF TOTAL TURNOVER HAS TO BE ADOPTED AND AS SUCH THE EXPENSES WHICH ARE REDUCED FROM THE EXPORT TURNOVER IN ACCOR DANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC DEFINITION CANNOT BE REDUCED FROM THE TOTAL TURNOVE R. 4. ON APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE, THE CIT(APPEALS) FOLL OWING THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN THE CASE OF CIT V. TATA ELXSI LTD., 349 ITR 98 (KARN) , HELD THAT WHATEVER IS EXCLUDED FROM THE EXPORT TURNOVER, HAS ALSO TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE TOTAL TU RNOVER. 5. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE CIT(APPEALS), THE REVENUE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. 6. THE ONLY GRIEVANCE OF THE REVENUE IS THAT THE DE CISION OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN TATA ELXSI (SUPRA) HAS NOT ATTAINED FINALITY AND A SLP BY THE DEPARTMENT IS PENDING BEFORE THE HON'B LE SUPREME COURT. WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT AS OF TODAY, LAW DECLARED B Y THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT ITA NO. 433/BANG/2012 PAGE 3 OF 3 OF KARNATAKA WHICH IS THE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IS BINDING ON US. WE THEREFORE HOLD THAT THE ORDER OF CIT(A) DOES NOT CA LL FOR ANY INTERFERENCE AND ACCORDINGLY THE SAME IS CONFIRMED. 7. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 5 TH DAY OF MARCH , 2015 . SD/- SD/- ( JASON P. BOAZ ) ( N.V. VASUDEVA N ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBE R BANGALORE, DATED, THE 5 TH MARCH , 2015 . /D S/ COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR/ SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, BANGALORE.