Darbar Sachkhand Saheb Charitable Trust, Kolhapur V. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Exemption), Pune

ITA 445/PUN/2023

AI Insights

The case involves the Darbar Sachkhand Saheb Charitable Trust, which appealed against the decisions of the CIT(Exemptions), Pune, denying them registration under section 12AB and approval under section 80G of the Income Tax Act, 1961. The Trust had initially been granted provisional registration but faced denial for final registration and section 80G approval due to alleged inadequacies in the documentation of their activities. The Tribunal examined the submissions and evidence provided by the Trust, including a detailed note on their charitable activities and supporting photographs, and concluded that the CIT(Exemptions) had erred in their decision.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 137765 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 3 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 21-06-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 20-06-2023
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 17-04-2023
• Laws Referred To: Income-tax Act, 1961
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Charitable institution
• Section: 119

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH, ‘A’ PUNE BEFORE SHRI R.S. SYAL, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI, JUDICIAL MEMBER आयकर अपील सं. / ITA Nos.444 & 445/PUN/2023 Darbar Sachkhand Saheb Charitable Trust, Valiwade Gandhinagar, Tal : Karvir, Dist. Kolhapur 416 119 Maharashtra PAN : AAETD0603L Vs. CIT(Exemptions) Pune Appellant Respondent आदेश / ORDER PER R.S.SYAL,VP : These two appeals are directed against the separate orders passed by the CIT(Exemptions), Pune on 30-03-2023. The first order is against the denial of Registration u/s.12AB of the Income-tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter also called `the Act’) and the second order is against denial of approval u/s.80G. For the sake of convenience, these two appeals are clubbed and are being disposed of by this consolidated order. 2. Briefly stated, the facts concerning the appeal against the order denying registration u/s.12AB are that the assessee was set Assessee by Shri Pramod Shingte Revenue by Shri Keyur Patel, CIT-DR Date of hearing 21-06-2023 Date of pronouncement 22-06-2023 ITA Nos.444 & 445/PUN/2023 Darbar Sachkhand Saheb Charitable Trust 2 up by Trust Deed dt. 07-10-2021, which was registered by the Charity Commissioner on 10-03-2022. The assessee applied for provisional registration on 31-03-2022, which was granted vide order dt. 07-04-2022. Thereafter, the assessee applied for final registration vide its application in Form 10AB on 30-09-2022. The ld. CIT(E) noted that the assessee did not furnish proper evidence in support of its reply and whatever was furnished was cryptic, inadequate and non-verifiable. That is how, he refused to grant registration thereby rejecting the assessee’s provisional registration granted on 07-04-2022. Aggrieved thereby, the assessee has come up in appeal before the Tribunal. 3. Having heard the rival submissions and gone through the relevant material on record, it is seen that the ld. CIT(E) required the assessee to furnish necessary details by issuing notice dated 09-01-2023. The information/details called for were furnished by the assessee. On verification of the details, the ld. CIT(E) issued another notice on 07-03-2023 pointing out certain discrepancies and called for further details. The assessee replied to such notice vide its letter dated 14-03-2023 by submitting a Note on the activities of Trust, being, Teaching Spirituality and Good manners to children on every Sunday; donation of food to the needy people ITA Nos.444 & 445/PUN/2023 Darbar Sachkhand Saheb Charitable Trust 3 on the occasion of Mahasivaratri; donating books to Backward class Girls school; and providing food and other necessities to various poor people and handicap students. In support of such activities, the assessee also furnished necessary photographs. Copy of the assessee’s reply dt. 14-03-2023 along with the necessary photographs has been placed at pages 52 onwards of the paper book. At this stage, it is pertinent to mention that the assessee was granted provisional registration only on 07-04-2022 and the details of whatever little activities it carried out from that date till the requirement by the ld. CIT(E), vide his notice dt. 07-03-2023, were duly furnished along with necessary photographs. The registration was denied by observing that “the assessee failed to comply with the provisions of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 and hence, the undersigned is unable to draw any satisfactory conclusion about genuineness of the activities of the assessee and has left no alternative but to reject the application”. The prescription of section 12AB(1)(b)(i) is that where the application is made under sub-clause (ii) or sub-clause (iii) or sub-clause (iv) or sub- clause (v) of the said clause, the CIT(E) may call for such documents or information from the trust or institution or make ITA Nos.444 & 445/PUN/2023 Darbar Sachkhand Saheb Charitable Trust 4 such inquiries as he thinks necessary in order to satisfy himself about— (A) the genuineness of activities of the trust or institution; and (B) the compliance of such requirements of any other law for the time being in force by the trust or institution as are material for the purpose of achieving its objects. Having seen all the documents furnished by the assessee as called for by him, the ld. CIT(E) failed to point out anything adverse either against the genuineness of the activities of the trust or the compliance of other laws. In our considered opinion, when the Trust Deed was there before the ld. CIT(E) and the assessee furnished all the necessary details of the activities carried out up to the stipulated date, there was no reason for the ld. CIT(E) to deny the benefit of registration u/s.12AB without specifically pointing out the non- fulfillment of the requisite condition(s) for the grant of registration. We, therefore, overturn the impugned order and direct to grant the registration u/s.12AB of the Act. 4. The facts and circumstances for the other appeal in respect of rejection of approval u/s.80G(5) are mutatis mutandis similar. The ld. CIT(E) has given the same reasons for denial of approval u/s.80G(5) as were given in his order rejecting the grant of registration u/s.12AB. Following the view taken hereinabove in ITA Nos.444 & 445/PUN/2023 Darbar Sachkhand Saheb Charitable Trust 5 the context of appeal against registration u/s.12AB, we overturn the impugned order and direct to grant approval u/s.80G of the Act. 5. In the result, both the appeals are allowed. Order pronounced in the Open Court on 22 nd June, 2023. Sd/- Sd/- ( S.S. VISWANETHRA RAVI) (R.S.SYAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT पुणे Pune; िदनांक Dated : 22 nd June, 2023 सतीश आदेश की ितिलिप अ ेिषत/Copy of the Order is forwarded to : 1. अपीलाथ / The Appellant; 2. थ / The Respondent 3. 4. DR, ITAT, ‘A’ Bench, Pune गाड फाईल / Guard file. आदेशानुसार/ BY ORDER, // True Copy // Senior Private Secretary आयकर अपीलीय अिधकरण ,पुणे / ITAT, Pune ITA Nos.444 & 445/PUN/2023 Darbar Sachkhand Saheb Charitable Trust 6 Date 1. Draft dictated on 21-06-2023 Sr.PS 2. Draft placed before author 21-06-2023 Sr.PS 3. Draft proposed & placed before the second member JM 4. Draft discussed/approved by Second Member. JM 5. Approved Draft comes to the Sr.PS/PS Sr.PS 6. Kept for pronouncement on Sr.PS 7. Date of uploading order Sr.PS 8. File sent to the Bench Clerk Sr.PS 9. Date on which file goes to the Head Clerk 10. Date on which file goes to the A.R. 11. Date of dispatch of Order. *