Dhanpat Rai Mohinder Pal, Karnal V. ITO, Karnal

ITA 4552/DEL/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2012] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 65826 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 6 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-10-2012
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 24-08-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: DEEPAK SEHGAL

Judgement Text

ITA NO.4552DEL/2012 ASSTT. YEAR: 2009-10 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI B.C. MEENA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI CHNADRAMOHAN GARG, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 4552/DEL/2012 ASSTT. YEAR: 2009-10 DHANPAT RAI MOHINDER PAL, VS INC OME TAX OFFICER, C/O MOHINDER SINGH ADVOCATE, WARD- 1, AAYAKAR BHAWAN, SHOP NO.12, 1 ST FLOOR, SECTOR-12, KARNAL. GANPATI MARKET, SUBZI MANDI, KARNAL. (PAN: AAAFD6788J) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY: NONE RESPONDENT BY: SHRI DEEPAK SEHGAL, SR.DR O R D E R PER CHANDRAMOHAN GARG, J.M. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE AGA INST THE ORDER OF CIT(A) KARNAL DATED 29.05.2012 FOR AY 2009-10. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS INITIALLY FILED ON 24.08.201 2 AND DATE WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 25.10.2012 I.E. TODAY. DESPITE SEVERAL CALLS, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR HIS REPRESENTATIVE APPEARED BEFORE US DURING TH E PROCEEDINGS. WE ALSO OBSERVE THAT THERE IS NO REQUEST OR APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT PLACED BEFORE THIS BENCH. IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT IN TERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL FILED BY IT. ITA NO.4552DEL/2012 ASSTT. YEAR: 2009-10 2 3. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW TH E PROVISIONS OF RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE DISMISS THIS APPEA L FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF SO ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF THIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL BE RECALLED. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMI SSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 31.10.2012. SD/- SD/- (BC. MEENA ) (CHANDRAMOHAN GARG) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DT. 31ST OCTOBER, 2012 GS COPY FORWARDED TO:- 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(A) 4. C.I.T. 5. DR BY ORDER ASSTT.REGISTRAR