RAKESH KALRA, NEW DELHI V. ACIT, CIRLCE- 56(1), NEW DELHI

ITA 4605/DEL/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 119 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2697 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 3 month(s) 25 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-11-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 14-07-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: S L ANURAGI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES SMC : DELHI BEFORE SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA.NO.4605/DEL./2017 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-2013 SHRI RAKESH KALRA, 329-B, POCKET J & K, DILSHAD GARDEN, DELHI 110 095. PAN AANPK4100G VS. THE ACIT, CIRCLE 56(1), VIKAS BHAWAN, I.T.O. NEW DELHI 110 002. (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) FOR ASSESSEE : - NONE - FOR REVENUE : SHRI S.L. ANURAGI, SR. D.R. DATE OF HEARING : 08 . 11 .2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08 . 11 .2018 ORDER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-19, NEW DELHI, DATED 26.05.2017, FOR THE A.Y. 2012-2013. 2. ON THE LAST DATE OF HEARING, THE APPEAL WAS ADJOURNED ON THE REQUEST OF THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE FOR 08.11.2018. HOWEVER, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE 2 ITA.NO.4605/DEL./2017 SHRI RAKESH KALRA, NEW DELHI. APPEAL. THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS, THEREFORE, LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477-478) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APPEAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME. RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE SAME, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UN-ADMITTED. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT. SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER DELHI, DATED 08 TH NOVEMBER, 2018 VBP/- 3 ITA.NO.4605/DEL./2017 SHRI RAKESH KALRA, NEW DELHI. COPY TO 1. THE APP ELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. CIT(A) CONCERNED 4. CIT CONCERNED 5. D.R. ITAT SMC BENCH, DELHI 6. GUARD FILE. // BY ORDER // ASSISTANT REGISTRAR : ITAT DELHI BENCHES : DELHI.