IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, F BENCH, MUMBAI. BEFORE SHRI D.K.AGARWAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRAMOD KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A NO.4614/ MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007-08 SPORTING & OUTDOOR SOLUTIONS, .. APPELLANT JAIN GANGWAL & ASSOCIATE, 103, VTM BUILDING, MEHRA COMPOUND A.K. ROAD, SAKINAKA, MUMBAI-400 072. PA NO.AAXFS 0866 M VS DY. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIR.15(1) ,. RES PONDEN T MUMBAI. APPEARANCES: NONE, FOR THE APPELLANT P.C.MAURYA, , FOR THE RESPONDENT O R D E R PER PRAMOD KUMAR: 1. THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AG AINST THE ORDER DATED 30 TH MARCH, 2010 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. 2. NOTICE POSTING THE APPEAL FOR HEARING ON 18 TH JULY, 2011 AND SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD TO THE ADDRESS GIVEN IN FORM NO.36 , HAS NOT EVOKED ANY RESPONSE FROM THE ASSESSEE. IT IS THEREFORE INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL WHICH IS HEREBY DISMISSED FOR N ON-PROSECUTION FOLLOWING THE JUDGMENT OF HONBLE BOMBAY HIGH COURT IN THE CASE O F CHEMIPOL V UOI, DATED 17 TH I.T.A NO.4614/ MUM/2010 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007-08 2 SEPTEMBER, 2009 (BHC) AND ORDER OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD. (1991) 38 ITD 320 (DEL). 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS D ISMISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 22 ND JULY, 2011 SD/- (D.K.AGARWAL) JUDICIAL MEMBER SD/- (PRAMOD KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED 22 ND JULY, 2011 PARIDA COPY TO: 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS),26, MUMBAI 4. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, 15 , MUMBAI 5. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE, BENCH F, MUMBAI //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR, ITAT, MUMBAI