IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI DELHI DELHI DELHI BENCH BENCH BENCH BENCH A AA A : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI : NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, ,, , VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND VICE PRESIDENT AND SMT MADHUMITA ROY SMT MADHUMITA ROY SMT MADHUMITA ROY SMT MADHUMITA ROY, JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. ITA NO. 4825 4825 4825 4825 /DEL/201 /DEL/201 /DEL/201 /DEL/201 6 66 6 ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR ASSESSMENT YEAR : : : : 201 201 201 201 2 22 2 - -- - 1 11 1 3 33 3 SH. SANJEEV BHATIA SH. SANJEEV BHATIA SH. SANJEEV BHATIA SH. SANJEEV BHATIA M MM M- -- -402, HAB 402, HAB 402, HAB 402, HABITAT SOCIETY, ITAT SOCIETY, ITAT SOCIETY, ITAT SOCIETY, VASUNDRA ENCLAVE, VASUNDRA ENCLAVE, VASUNDRA ENCLAVE, VASUNDRA ENCLAVE, NEW DELHI NEW DELHI NEW DELHI NEW DELHI PAN : PAN : PAN : PAN : AAFPB7250A AAFPB7250A AAFPB7250A AAFPB7250A. .. . VS. VS. VS. VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX OFFICER INCOME TAX OFFICER , ,, , WARD WARD WARD WARD- -- -60(4) 60(4) 60(4) 60(4), ,, , NEW DELHI NEW DELHI NEW DELHI NEW DELHI. .. . (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : SHRI M. BARANWAL, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING : 24. 24. 24. 24.11 1111 11.2020 .2020 .2020 .2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 24.11 24.11 24.11 24.11.2020 .2020 .2020 .2020 ORDER ORDER ORDER ORDER PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU PER G.S. PANNU, , , , VP VPVP VP : :: : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2012-13 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A), NEW D ELHI DATED 11.07.2016. 2. THE ASSESSEE, VIDE ITS LETTER DATED 11.11.2020, RECEIVED THROUGH EMAIL, HAS REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL F ILED BY HIM AND STATED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE DI SPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERA TION UNDER THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020. A CERTIFICATE TO THI S EFFECT UNDER SECTION 5(1) OF THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT , 2020 HAS ALSO BEEN FILED. 3. LEARNED SENIOR DR HAS NO OBJECTION. ITA-4825/DEL/2016 2 4. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ACCEPT THE REQUEST OF T HE ASSESSEE FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED ON CONCLUSION OF VIRT UAL HEARING ON 24 TH NOVEMBER, 2020. SD/- SD/- ( (( ( MADHUMITA ROY MADHUMITA ROY MADHUMITA ROY MADHUMITA ROY ) )) ) (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU (G.S. PANNU ) )) ) JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL JUDICIAL MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT VICE PRESIDENT SH COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR