A V. MEMON, MUMBAI V. DCIT CEN CIR 45, MUMBAI

ITA 4830/MUM/2013

• Counselvise Citation: 483019914 RSA 2013
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 3 month(s) 17 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-10-2015
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 06-04-2015
• Assessment Year: 2004-2005
• Appeal Filed On: 21-06-2013
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Assessee Lawyers: ROMIL SHAH

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH A, MUMBAI BEORE SHRI G.S.PANNU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI RAMLAL NEGI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 4830/MUM/2013(ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2004-05) ITA NO. 4831/MUM/2013(ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2005-06) ITA NO. 4832/MUM/2013(ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006-07) ITA NO. 4833/MUM/2013(ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08) ITA NO. 4834/MUM/2013(ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09) A.V.MENON, 203,D-SWING, MARVEY ROAD, MALAD (W), MUMBAI 400 064 PAN:AADPM 5484B ... APPELLANT VS. THE DCIT, CEN. CIR.-45, MUMBAI. .... RESPO NDENT APPELLANT BY : SHRI ROMIL SHAH RESPONDENT BY : SHRI DURGA DUTT DATE OF HEARING : 08/10/2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08/10/2015 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU,AM: THE CAPTIONED APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DI RECTED AGAINST A COMMON ORDER OF THE CIT(A)-38, MUMBAI DATED 28/03/2 013, PERTAINING TO THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2004-05 TO 2008-09, WHICH I N TURN HAS ARISEN FROM ORDERS PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER DATED 30/06/2011 UNDER SECTION 271(1)(C) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 19 61 (IN SHORT THE ACT). 2 ITA NO. 4830TO 4834/MUM/2013 2. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED FIVE SEPARATE LETTERS IN RESPECT OF ALL THE APPEALS, WHICH ARE DATED 21 ST SEPTEMBER, 2015. ALL THE LETTERS ARE SIMILARLY WORDED, EXCEPT DIFFERENCE IN ITA NOS.& AS SESSMENT YEARS. THE CONTENTS OF THE LETTER SUBMITTED IN RESPECT OF ITA NO.4830/MUM/2013 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2004-05 READ AS UNDER:- RE: A V MENON (APPELLANT) ASSESSMENT YEAR (AY' ) :2004-05 ITA 4830/MU/2013(ASSESSEES APPEAL) A-BENCH. SUB:- WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL. I REFER TO THE ABOVE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE ORDE R UNDER SECTION 271(1)(C) OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 PASSED BY THE HONBLE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX- 38 DATED 28 MARCH 2013 SCHEDULED FOR HE ARING ON 8 OCTOBER 2015. IN THIS CONNECTION, I DO NOT WISH TO PURSUE THE APP EAL AND HENCE REQUEST YOUR HONOURS TO KINDLY PERMIT ME TO WITHDRAW THE APPEAL AND OBLIGE. INCONVENIENCE CAUSED TO YOUR HONOURS IS HIGHLY REGR ETTED. 3. LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE DID NOT HAVE ANY OBJECTION TO SUCH REQUEST FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEALS. THEREF ORE, AFTER HEARING BOTH THE PARTIES, THE APPEALS WERE PERMITTED TO BE WITHDRAWN. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN . THE ABOVE DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN CO URT IN THE PRESENCE OF BOTH THE PARTIES AT THE CONCLUSION OF T HE HEARING ON 08/10/2015. SD/- SD/- (RAMLAL NEGI) (G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT ME MBER MUMBAI, DATED 08/10/2015 3 ITA NO. 4830TO 4834/MUM/2013 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT , 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT(A)- 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, MUMBAI VM , SR. PS