MR. ISMAIL. F. MUKADAM, Mumbai V. CIT APPELAS 56, Mumbai

ITA 4885/MUM/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4507 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 6 month(s) 16 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 09-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2013-2014
• Appeal Filed On: 23-07-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SMITA VERMA

Judgement Text

1 THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL SMC BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI SAKTIJIT DEY (JUDICIAL MEMBER) I.T.A. NO.4885/MUM/2019 (ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2013-14) SHRI ISMAIL F MUKADAM 45, HAJI HABIB BLDG 1 ST FLOOR, ROOM NO.9 JANJIKAR STREET, MUMBAI PAN : AAJPC7008F VS INCOME-TAX OFFICER-17(2)(1), MUMBAI (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SMT. SMITA VERMA (DR) DATE OF HEARING 02-02-2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 02/02/2021 O R D E R PER SAKTIJIT DEY, JM THIS IS AN APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 31-05-2019 OF LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-56, MUMBAI FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2013-14. 2. WHEN THE APPEAL WAS CALLED FOR HEARING, NO ONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. HOWEVER, THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED A LETTER DATED 27-01-2021 SEEKING WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL AS HE HAS FILED DECLARATION UNDER THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 FOR SETTLING THE DISPUTE ARISING IN THIS APPEAL. THE LEARNED 2 DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE HAS NO OBJECTION TO THE AFORESAID REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEE. 3. IN VIEW OF THE FACTS DISCUSSED ABOVE, I PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THIS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 02 /02/2021. SD/- (SAKTIJIT DEY) JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI, DATED :02/ 02/2021. PAVANAN, SR.P.S (ON CONTRACT) COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT. 2. THE RESPONENT. 3. THE CIT(A) 4. 4. THE CIT 5. D.R., ITAT, MUMBAI. 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY// BY ORDER I.T.A.T., MUMBAI.