INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI AMIT SHUKLA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI PRASHANT MAHARISHI, ACCOUNTANT ME MBER ITA NO.:-492/DEL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2007-08 O R D E R PER AMIT SHUKLA, J.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE OR DER OF LD. CIT(A)-1, NOIDA VIDE ORDER DATED 30.11.2015 PERTAI NING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. M/S. ASSOTECH SUPERTECH JOINT VENTURE 1114, HEMKUNT CHAMBER, 89, NEHRU PLACE NEW DELHI 110 019 PAN AAAJA1382K VS. ITO, WARD-1, NOIDA (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY: NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SHRI AMIT JAIN, SR. DR DATE OF HEARING 26/02/2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 26/02/2018 2 2. IN THIS CASE NOTICE WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE FOR HEARING BY REGD. AD POST FOR 26.2.2018 AT THE ADDRESS MENTIONED IN FORM NO. 36 VIDE COLMUN NO. 10. 3. ON 26.2.2018, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR ITS AUTHORI SED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALSO NOT FILED AN Y ADJOURNMENT . IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS N OT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF APPEAL. 4. CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND KEEPING IN VIEW THE PROV ISIONS OF ORDER V RULE 19A OF THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULE S, AS WERE CONSIDERED IN THE CASES OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN (INDIA) PVT. LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL); AND LATE TUKOJI RAO HOLKAR, 223 ITR 480 ( MP), WE DISMISS THIS APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. THE ASSESSEE, IF S O ADVISED, SHALL BE FREE TO MOVE THIS TRIBUNAL PRAYING FOR RECALLING OF T HIS ORDER AND EXPLAINING THE REASONS FOR NON-COMPLIANCE ETC. AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SATISFIED ABOUT THE REASONS ETC., THEN THIS ORDER SHALL B E RECALLED. 5. IN THE RESULT APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMIS SED IN LIMINE. THIS DECISION WAS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN C OURT ON 26 TH FEBRUARY, 2018. SD/- SD/- (PRASHANT MAHARISHI) (AMIT SHUKLA) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 26/02/2018 3 VEENA COPY FORWARDED TO 1. APPLICANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT (A) 5. DR:ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT, NEW DELHI