M/s. Veetee Fine Foods Ltd., Haryana V. ITO (TDS), Rohtak

ITA 4941/DEL/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 126 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4134 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 5 month(s) 11 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 12-01-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: H
• Assessment Year: misc
• Appeal Filed On: 31-07-2015
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES: D , NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI R . K.PANDA , ACCOUNTANTMEMBER AND SMT. BEENA A PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 4941 /DEL/2015 A.Y. 2010 - 11 VEETEE FINE FOODS LTD. 1016, ELDECO COUNTY OPP. JURASIK PARK G.T. KARNAL ROAD NEAR MURTHAL DT. SONEPAT 131 001 HARYANA PAN: AAACP0658C VS . ITO (TDS) ROHTAK (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SHRI A MIT JAIN , SR.D.R DATE OF HEARING 10.01.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 12. 01.2018 ORDER PER BEENA A PILLAI, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE HAS BEEN DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A), ROHTAK DATED 30.05.2013 FOR THE A.Y. 2010 - 11. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF THE APPEAL DESPITE ISSUE OF NOTICE S DATED 10. 0 8. 20 17 FIXING THE DA TE OF HEARING AT 19.09.2017 AND DATED 19. 09 .17 FIXING THE DATE OF HEARING ON 10.01.2018 THROUGH REGISTERED POST. IT APPEARS THAT ASSESSEE IS NO MORE INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF ASSESSEE IS LIABLE TO BE DISMISSED AS UN - ADMITTED. 2. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE AND HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL RULES AND FOLLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF ITA 4941 /DEL/2015 A.Y. 2010 - 11 VEETEE FINE FOODS LTD. PAGE 2 OF 2 THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.); HON BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT DECISION IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT 223 ITR 480 (MP), AND ALSO THE DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. B. BHATTACHARGEE & ANOTHER (118 ITR 461 AT PAGE 477 - 478) WHEREIN THEIR LORDSHIPS HELD THAT THE APP EAL DOES NOT MEAN, MERE FILING OF THE MEMO OF APPEAL , BUT EFFECTIVELY PURSUING THE SAME, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS UN - ADMITTED. 3. IN THE RESULT THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED FOR NON PROSECUTION. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN T HE OPEN COURT ON 1 2 T H JANUARY, 2018 . S D / - S D / - ( R.K.PANDA ) (BEENA A PILLAI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 1 2 T H JANUARY, 2018 . *MV COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASST. REGISTRAR ITAT, DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI