IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH B NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI U. B. S. BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI SHAMIM YAHYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER I.T.A. NO. 4966 & 4967 /DEL/2013 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 & 2008-09) DHARAM RAJ CONSTRUCTION & VS. DCIT, CC-14, INFRASTRUCTURE P. LTD., NEW DELHI E-24, PRASHANT VIHAR, ROHINI, NEW DELHI PAN/GIR NO.: AACCD4865D (APPELLANTS) (RESPONDENTS) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY: MRS. SUDHA KUMARI, CIT DR ORDER PER U B S BEDI, JUDICIAL MEMBER: THESE TWO APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE EMANATE FROM SEP ARATE ORDERS PASSED BY LD. CIT(A) XXXIII, NEW DELHI BOTH DATED 2 6.08.2013 RELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2007-08 & 2008-09 RESPECTIVELY. 2. DESPITE SENDING NOTICE OF HEARING SUFFICIENTLY I N ADVANCE, NEITHER ANYBODY ATTENDED NOR ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMEN T HAS BEEN RECEIVED WHEN THE CASE WAS CALLED UP FOR HEARING. IT IS THU S INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF THESE APPEALS. 3. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FO LLOWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING THAT OF MULTIPLAN INDIA I.T.A. NOS.4966, 4967/DEL/2013 2 LTD.; 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURTS DECISION IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), WE TREAT THIS APPEAL AS UNADMITTED AND DISMISS THE SAME. 4. AS A RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSE D. 5. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT SOON AFTER CONCL USION OF HEARING ON 20 TH FEB., 2014. SD./- SD./- (SHAMIM YAHYA) (U.B.S.BEDI) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE: 20 TH FEB., 2014. SP. COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(A)-XXV, NEW DELHI AR, ITAT, 5. CIT(ITAT), NEW DELHI NEW DELHI