Marc India Ltd., New Delhi V. PCIT- 06, New Delhi

ITA 5021/DEL/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 2194 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 30-08-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 22-09-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SHEFALI SWROOP

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH E NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI O.P. KANT, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 5021/DEL/2016 ASSESSMENT YEA R: 2012-13 M/S MARC INDIA LIMITED VS. PCIT-06, PLOT NO. 5, 2 ND FLOOR, BN BLOCK ROOM NO. 418, C.R. BLDG., CENTRA MARKET, LOCAL SHOPPING I.P. ESTATE, NEW DEL HI COMPLEX, ADJOINING BANK OF BARODA, SHALIMAR BAGH, NEW DELHI 88 (PAN: AAACM7785P) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : MS. SHEFALI SWROOP, CIT(DR) DATE OF HEARING: 30.08.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 30.08.2018 ORDER PER SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA, JM THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THIS APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 22/7/2016 PASSED BY THE LD. PR. CIT-06, NEW DELHI RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13. 2. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. HOWEV ER, THE ASSESSEES POA, SH. RAJ K. AGGARWAL, HAS FILED THE APPLICATION DATED 09.03.2018 IN WHICH HE HAS REQUESTED FOR THE WITHDRAWAL OF THE AP PEAL. FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE, THE CONTENTS OF THE APPLICATION ARE RE PRODUCED AS UNDER:- 2 09 TH MARCH, 2018 THE SUPERINTENDENT, , INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI 110 003 SUB:- WITHDRAWN OF APPEAL NO. 5021/DELHI/16/ OF M/S MARC INDIA LIMITED FOR AY 2012-13. RESPECTED SIR, WE SHALL LIKE TO INFORM THAT APPEAL NO. 5021/DELHI/16 OF M/S MARCH INDIA LIMITED FOR AY 2012-13 HAS BEEN RE-FIXED FOR HEARING WITH HONBLE BENCH-E FOR 27.3.2018. THE ASSESSEE COMPANY IS NOT INTEREST TO PURSUE THE MATTER AND DECIDED TO WITHDRAW THE ABOVE APPEAL. FURTEHR WE HAVE ALSO EARLIER REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF ABOVE APPEAL (PHOTOCOPY ECNLSOED). YOU ARE REQUESTED TO DO THE NEEDFUL IN THIS REGARD. INCONVENIENCE CAUSED IS REGRETTED. THANKING YOU, YOURS FAITHFULLY, SD/- RAJ K AGGARWAL POA 3. LD. CIT(DR) DID NOT OBJECT THE WRITTEN REQUEST O F THE ASSESSEES POA. 4. WE HAVE HEARD LD. DR AND PERUSED THE RECORDS, ES PECIALLY THE APPLICATION DATED 09.03.2018 FILED BY THE POA OF TH E ASSESSEE FOR 3 WITHDRAWAL OF ITS APPEAL. KEEPING IN VIEW OF THE F ACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE, AS AFORESAID, WE ACCEPT THE AFORESAID REQUEST OF THE ASSESSEES POA FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE APPEAL AND ACC ORDINGLY, WE DISMISS THE ASSESSEES APPEAL AS WITHDRAWN. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE STANDS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 30/08/2018. SD/- SD/- (O.P. KANT) (SUDHANSHU SRIVASTAVA ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED: 30.08.2018 SRB COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4.CIT(A) 4. DR, ITAT BY ORDER ASSTT. REGISTRAR