MANOJ MULCHAND BRAMHECHA, AURANGABAD V. ITO, WARD1(1), AURANGABAD, AURANGABAD

ITA 506/PUN/2024

• Counselvise Citation: [2024] 101 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6438 (ITAT-PUNE)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 18-06-2024
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2016-2017
• Appeal Filed On: 14-03-2024
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Section: 147

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE “A” BENCH : PUNE BEFORE SHRI RAMA KANTA PANDA, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI SATBEER SINGH GODARA, JUDICIAL MEMBER I.T.A.Nos.504, 505, 506 & 507/PUN./2024 Assessment Years 2014-15, 2015-16, 2016-17 & 2017-18 Shri Manoj Mulchand Bramhecha, C/o. Manoj Electronics, Gulmandi, New Dalal Wadi Road, AURANGABAD – 431 001. Maharashtra. PAN AIAPB4027G vs. The Income Tax Officer, Ward-1(1), AURANGABAD. (Appellant) (Respondent) For Assessee : -None- For Revenue : Shri Ramnath P Murkunde Date of Hearing : 06.06.2024 Date of Pronouncement : 19.06.2024 ORDER PER SATBEER SINGH GODARA, J.M. : These assessee’s four appeals for assessment years 2014-2015 to 2017-2018, arise against the National Faceless Appeal Centre [in short the “NFAC”] Delhi’s as many Din and Order Nos.ITBA/NFAC/S/250/2023-24/ 1060120307(1); 1060120700(1); 1060121584(1) & 1060118362(1); all dated 25.01.2024, respectively involving proceedings u/s. 147 r.w.s.144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “the Act”). 2 ITA.Nos.504 to 507/PUN./2024 Cases called twice. None appears at assessee’s behest. He is accordingly proceeded ex-parte. Case files perused. 2. Learned DR vehemently argued during the course of hearing that both the learned lower authorities and more particularly, the NFAC herein, has rightly confirmed the Assessing Officer’s action making the impugned addition(s) in sec.144 assessments. 3. We noticed in this factual backdrop that the assessee had filed his additional evidence in the lower appellate proceedings in tune with Rule 46A of the I.T. Rules. Learned NFAC sought for a remand report. The Assessing Officer duly submitted the same. Learned NFAC thereafter sought for the assessee’s rejoinder by 15.12.2023 which could be submitted up-to 11.01.2024. All this prompted the learned NFAC to proceed ex-parte against the assessee thereby confirming the impugned addition(s). 3.1. The above narrated factual backdrop makes it clear that the assessee had failed to submit rejoinder to the Assessing Officer’s remand report(s) submitted before the NFAC. Learned DR fails to dispute that the assessee could be hardly termed as a habitual defaulter having failed to cooperate in the lower appellate proceedings. We accordingly deem it appropriate in the larger interest of justice to restore 3 ITA.Nos.504 to 507/PUN./2024 the assessee’s instant four appeals back to learned CIT(A)/ NFAC for it’s afresh appropriate adjudication in tune with sec.250(6) of the Act requiring it to effectively framing any points of determination followed by a detailed adjudication thereof. It is made clear that the same shall be subject to the assessee’s availing three effective opportunities of hearing to plead and prove all the relevant facts in consequential proceedings. Ordered accordingly. 4. These assessee’s four appeals I.T.A.Nos.504, 505, 506 & 507/PUN./2024 are allowed for statistical purposes in above terms. A copy of this common order be placed in the respective case files. Order pronounced in the open Court on 19.06.2024. Sd/- Sd/- [RAMA KANTA PANDA] [SATBEER SINGH GODARA] VICE PRESIDENT JUDICIAL MEMBER Pune, Dated 19 th June, 2024 VBP/- Copy to 1. The appellant 2. The respondent 3. The Pr. CIT, Pune concerned 4. D.R. ITAT, “A” Bench, Pune. 5. Guard File. //By Order// //True Copy // Sr. Private Secretary, ITAT, Pune Benches, Pune.