IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI BENCH “B”, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.5106/M/2018 Assessment Year: 2013-14 M/s. Navodaya Consultant Ltd., Trimurti Apartment, Ground Floor, 97 Park Street, Kolkata – 700 016 PAN: AABCM9988R Vs. DCIT-CC-3(2), Room No.1913, 19 th Floor, Air India Building, Nariman Point, Mumbai - 400021 (Appellant) (Respondent) Present for: Assessee by : None Revenue by : Shri Vijay Kumar Soni, D.R. Date of Hearing : 12.10.2021 Date of Pronouncement : 11.11.2021 O R D E R Per Rajesh Kumar, Accountant Member: The present appeal has been preferred by the assessee against the order dated 03.11.2017 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to as the CIT(A)] relevant to assessment year 2013-14. 2. None has appeared on behalf of the assessee. However, the assessee filed a letter dated 03.05.2021 requesting the Bench to allow the assessee to voluntarily withdraw the appeal as the assessee has gone into Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme and also submitted that form No.3 which has already been issued. ITA No.5106/M/2018 M/s. Navodaya Consultant Ltd. 2 3. The Ld. D.R. fairly conceded to the withdrawal of the appeal. 4. Accordingly, we are inclined to dismiss the appeal of the assessee. 5. In the result, the appeal of the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 11.11.2021. Sd/- Sd/- (Amarjit Singh) (Rajesh Kumar) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai, Dated: 11.11.2021. * Kishore, Sr. P.S. Copy to: The Appellant The Respondent The CIT, Concerned, Mumbai The CIT (A) Concerned, Mumbai The DR Concerned Bench //True Copy// [ By Order Dy/Asstt. Registrar, ITAT, Mumbai.