IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH A, NEW DELHI BEFORE MS. SUCHITRA KAMBLE, JUDICIAL MEMBER DR. B. R. R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 5156/DEL/2018 : ASSTT. YEAR : 1990-91 DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, NEW DELHI-110055 VS SAHARA INDIA (FIRM), R/O SAHARA INDIA BHAWAN, 1- KAPOORTHALA COMPLEX, ALIGANJ, LUCKNOW-226024 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) PAN NO. A A MFS0216L ASSESSEE BY : SH. HARDEEP SINGH, CA REVENUE BY : SH. VIRENDRA SINGH, SR. DR DATE OF HEAR ING: 28 . 09 .20 21 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 28 .0 9 .20 21 ORDER PER DR. B.R.R. KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER: THE PRESENT APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE REVENUE A GAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A)-23, NEW DELHI DATED 16. 05.2018. 2. ACCORDING TO CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATED 08/08/20 19, THE CBDT IN SUPERSESSION OF EARLIER INSTRUCTIONS HAS DI RECTED THAT DEPARTMENTS APPEALS BEFORE ITAT SHALL NOT BE FILED IN CASES WHERE THE TAX EFFECT DOES NOT EXCEED THE MONETARY L IMIT OF RS. 50 LACS. THE TAX WILL NOT INCLUDE ANY INTEREST THE REON. IT IS FURTHER CLARIFIED THAT EVEN IF IN THE CASE OF AN ASSESSEE, DISPUTED ISSUES ARISE IN MORE THAN ONE ASSESSMENT Y EAR, APPEAL CANNOT BE FILED IN RESPECT OF SUCH ASSESSMENT YEAR OR YEARS IN WHICH THE TAX EFFECT IN RESPECT OF DISPUTED ISSUES EXCEEDS THE MONETARY LIMIT SO SPECIFIED. ITA NO. 5156/DEL/2018 SAHARA INDIA (FIRM) 2 3. ADMITTEDLY, IN THE DEPARTMENTAL APPEAL, THE TAX EFFECT IS LESS THAN RS. 50 LACS, THEREFORE, DEPARTMENTAL APPE AL IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. THE LD. DR COULD NOT BRING TO OUR NO TICE ANY EXCEPTIONS MENTIONED IN THE SAID CIRCULAR. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE REVENUE IS DISMI SSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28/09/2021. SD/- SD/- (SUCHITRA KAMBLE) (DR. B. R. R. KUMAR) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACC OUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 28/09/2021 *SUBODH* COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR