Sh. Surender Singh Dahiya, V. ITO, Sonepat

ITA 516/DEL/2009

• Counselvise Citation: [2009] 114 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 6992 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 17 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 28-05-2009
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: G
• Next Hearing Date: 15-03-2010
• Assessment Year: 2002-2003
• Appeal Filed On: 11-02-2009
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: M J GOSWAMI

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH F NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA : VICE PRESIDENT AN D SHRI GEORGE MATHAN: JUDICIAL MEMEBR ITA NOS. ITA. NOS. 515, 516, 517, 518 & 519/DEL/09 ASSTT. YRS: 2000-01, 02-03, 03-04, 04-05 & 05-06 SH. SURENDER SINGH DAHIYA VS. INCOME-TAX OFFICER , S/O SH. MANGE RAM DAHIYA, WARD 3, SONEPAT. VILL. PIPLI, TEHSIL KHARKHODA, DISTT. SONEPAT (HARYANA) PAN/GIR NO. AKKPD2310A ( APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT REJECTE D RESPONDENT BY : SMT. M.J. GOSWAMI DR . O R D E R PER G.E. VEERABHADRAPPA, V.P: : ALL THESE APPEALS FILED BY THE VERY SAME ASSESSEE A RISE OUT OF CONSOLIDATED ORDER OF CIT(A) DATED 20-11-2008 IN A PPEAL NOS. 252 TO 256/SPT/07-08 FOR A.Y. 2000-01, 2002-03, 03-04, 04- 05 & 05-06. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING AN APPLICATION CAME TO BE FILED BY ADVOCATE ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, REQUESTING FOR ADJOURNMENT. THE REGISTRY HAS POINTED OUT DEFECT IN THE FORM OF SHORT PAYMENT IN FILING FEE BEFORE THE ITAT. THE 2 ASSESSEE HAS NOT PRODUCED EVIDENCE OF PAYMENT OF TH IS SUM. MOREOVER, THE DR HAS POINTED OUT THAT FORM NO. 36 IS NOT SIGNED B Y THE ASSESSEE IN ALL THESE CASES. WE, THEREFORE, DISMISS THESE APPEALS A THE T HRESHOLD AS NOT MAINTAINABLE, IN VIEW OF THE DEFECTS DISCUSSED ABOV E. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 28-5-2009. ( GEORGE MATHAN ) ( G.E. VEERABHADR APPA) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT DATED: 28 TH MAY, 2009. MP COPY TO : 1. ASSESSEE 2. AO 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR