ASHAPURA CLAYTECH LTD, MUMBAI V. ACIT CC 22 & 30, MUMBAI

ITA 5191/MUM/2015

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 121 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 7190 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 6 month(s) 3 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 07-05-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 04-11-2015
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: M C OMI NINGSHEN
• Assessee Lawyers: H N MOTIWALLA
• Keywords: Reopening of assessment; Depreciation; Unabsorbed depreciation; Reassessment proceedings
• Section: 143(3); 32

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R. BASKARAN (AM) & SHRI PAWAN SINGH (JM) I.T.A. NO. 5191 /MUM/20 15 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 08 - 09 ) M/S. ASHAPURA CLAYTECH LTD. C/O. H.N. MOTIWALLA & CO., 508, SHARDA CHAMBERS 33, NEW MARINE L INES MUMBAI - 400 020. PAN : AAACA8321M V S . ACIT CC - 22 & 30 AAYAKAR BHAVAN M.K. ROAD MUMBAI - 400020. ( APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) A SSESSEE BY SHRI H.N. MOTIWALLA DEPARTMENT BY S HRI M.C. OMI NINGSHEN DATE OF HEARING 7 . 0 5 . 201 8 DATE OF PRONOUNCEME NT 7 . 0 5 . 201 8 O R D E R PER B.R. BASKARAN (AM) : - THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 28.8.2015 PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIT(A) - 51, MUMBAI AND IT RELATES TO A.Y. 2008 - 09. 2. THE I SSUE S URGED IN THIS APPEAL (A) REJE CTION OF CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE FOR SET OFF UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION RELATING TO A.Y. 1998 - 99 & 1999 - 2000. (B) VALIDITY OF REOPENING OF ASSESSMENT. 3. THE FACTS ARE SET OUT IN BRIEF. THE ASSESSMENT IN THE HANDS OF THE ASSESSEE WAS COMPLETED U/S. 143(3) OF THE ACT FOR THE YEAR UNDER CONSIDERATION DETERMINING TOTAL INCOME AT NIL AFTER ADJUSTING BROUGHT FORWARD BUSINESS LOSS AND UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION. THE A SSESSMENT WAS REOPENED SUBSEQUENTLY BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER ON NOTICING THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS ALLOWED SET OFF UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR S PRIOR TO A.Y. 2002 - 03. AS PER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 32(2), THEN EXISTING , DEPRECIATION LOSS PRIOR TO A.Y. 2002 - 03 CANNOT BE CARRIED FORWARD FOR MORE THAN 8 YEARS. ACCORDINGLY THE AO M/S. ASHAPURA CLAYTECH LTD. 2 TOOK THE VIE W THAT THE INCOME HAS ESCAPED ASSESSMENT BY ALLOWING BROUGHT FORWARD UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION OF AY 1998 - 99 AND 1999 - 2000 IN THE ORIGINAL ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS. I N THE REOPENED ASSESSMENT, THE ASSESSING OFFICER REJECTED CLAIM OF DEDUCTION OF UNABSORBED DEP RECIATION PERTAINING TO A.YS. 1998 - 99 & 1999 - 2000 AND THE SAME WAS ALSO CONFIRMED BY THE LEARNED CIT(A). WE NOTICE THAT B OTH TAX AUTHORITIES HAVE RELIED UPON THE DECISION RENDERED BY SPECIAL BENCH OF THE ITAT IN THE CASE OF DCIT VS. TIMES GUARANTY LTD. (IT A NO. 4917 & 4918/MUM/ 2008 DATED 30.6.2010. 4. WE HAVE HEARD THE PARTIES AND PERUSED THE RECORD. WE NOTICED THAT THIS ISSUE HAS BEEN DECIDED IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE BY HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF GENERAL MOTORS INDIA (P) LTD. VS. DCIT (201 2) 25 TAXMAN.COM 364. FOR THE SAKE OF CONVENIENCE, WE EXTRACT BELOW THE OPERATIVE PORTION OF THE ORDER PASSED BY HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT IN THE ABOVE SAID CASE: - 31. PRIOR TO THE FINANCE ACT NO.2 OF 1996 THE UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION FOR ANY YEAR WAS ALL OWED TO BE CARRY FORWARD INDEFINITELY AND BY A DEEMING FICTION BECAME ALLOWANCE OF THE IMMEDIATELY SUCCEEDING YEAR. THE FINANCE ACT NO.2 OF 1996 RESTRICTED THE CARRY FORWARD OF UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION AND SET - OFF TO A LIMIT OF 8 YEARS, FROM THE A.Y.1997 - 98 . CIRCULAR NO.762 DATED 18.2.1998 ISSUED BY THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES (CBDT) IN THE FORM OF EXPLANATORY NOTES CATEGORICALLY PROVIDED, THAT THE UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE FOR ANY PREVIOUS YEAR TO WHICH FULL EFFECT CANNOT BE GIVEN IN THAT PREV IOUS YEAR SHALL BE CARRIED FORWARD AND ADDED TO THE DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE OF THE NEXT YEAR AND BE DEEMED TO BE PART THEREOF. 32. SO, THE UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE OF A.Y. 1996 - 97 WOULD BE ADDED TO THE ALLOWANCE OF A.Y. 1997 - 98 AND THE LIMITATION O F 8 YEARS FOR THE CARRY - FORWARD AND SET - OFF OF SUCH UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION WOULD START FROM A.Y. 1997 - 98. 33. WE MAY NOW EXAMINE THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 32(2) OF THE ACT BEFORE ITS AMENDMENT BY FINANCE ACT 2001. THE SECTION PRIOR TO ITS AMENDMENT B Y FINANCE ACT, 2001, READ AS UNDER: - WHERE IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE ASSESSEE FULL EFFECT CANNOT BE GIVEN TO ANY ALLOWANCE UNDER CLAUSE (II) OF SUB - SECTION (1) IN ANY PREVIOUS YEAR OWNING TO THERE BEING NO PROFITS OR GAINS CHARGEABLE FOR THAT PREVIOUS YE AR OR OWING TO THE PROFITS OR GAINS BEING LESS M/S. ASHAPURA CLAYTECH LTD. 3 THAN THE ALLOWANCE, THEN, THE ALLOWANCE OR THE PART OF ALLOWANCE TO WHICH EFFECT HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN (HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE), AS THE CASE MAY BE, - (I) SHALL BE SET OFF AGAIN ST THE PROFITS AND GAINS, IF ANY, OF ANY BUSINESS OR PROFESSION CARRIED ON BY HIM AND ASSESSABLE FOR THAT ASSESSMENT YEAR; (II) IF THE UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE CANNOT BE WHOLLY SET OFF UNDER CLAUSE (I), THE AMOUNT NOT SO SET OFF SHALL BE SET OFF FROM THE INCOME UNDER ANY OTHER HEAD, IF ANY, ASSESSABLE FOR THAT ASSESSMENT YEAR; (III) IF THE UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE CANNOT BE WHOLLY SET OFF UNDER CLAUSE (I) AND CLAUSE (II), THE AMOUNT OF ALLOWANCE NOT SO SET OFF SHALL BE CARRIED FORWARD TO THE FOLLOW ING ASSESSMENT YEAR AND (A) IT SHALL BE SET OFF AGAINST THE PROFITS AND GAINS, IF ANY, OF ANY BUSINESS OR PROFESSION CARRIED ON BY HIM AND ASSESSABLE FOR THAT ASSESSMENT YEAR; (B) IF THE UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE CANNOT BE WHOLLY SO SET OFF, THE AMOUNT OF UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE NOT SO SET OFF SHALL BE CARRIED FORWARD TO THE FOLLOWING ASSESSMENT YEAR NOT BEING MORE THAN EIGHT ASSESSMENT YEARS IMMEDIATELY SUCCEEDING THE ASSESSMENT YEAR FOR WHICH THE AFORESAID ALLOWANCE WAS FIRST COMPU TED: PROVIDED THAT THE TIME LIMIT OF EIGHT ASSESSMENT YEARS SPECIFIED IN SUB - CLAUSE (B) SHALL NOT APPLY IN CASE OF A COMPANY FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR BEGINNING WITH THE ASSESSMENT YEAR RELEVANT TO THE PREVIOUS YEAR IN WHICH THE SAID COMPANY HAS BECOME A S ICK INDUSTRIAL COMPANY UNDER SUB - SECTION (1) OF SECTION 17 OF THE SICK INDUSTRIAL COMPANY (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT, 1985 (1 OF 1986) AND ENDING WITH THE ASSESSMENT YEAR RELEVANT TO THE PREVIOUS YEAR IN WHICH THE ENTIRE NET WORTH OF SUCH COMPANY BECOMES EQU AL TO OR EXCEEDS THE ACCUMULATED LOSSES. EXPLANATION. - FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS CLAUSE, NET WORTH SHALL HAVE THE MEANING ASSIGNED TO IT IN CLAUSE (GA) OF SUB - SECTION (1) OF SECTION 3 OF THE SICK INDUSTRIAL COMPANIES (SPECIAL PROVISIONS) ACT, 1985. 3 4. THE AFORESAID PROVISION WAS INTRODUCED BY FINANCE (NO.2) ACT, 1996 AND FURTHER AMENDED BY THE FINANCE ACT, 2000. THE PROVISION INTRODUCED BY FINANCE (NO.2) ACT WAS CLARIFIED BY THE FINANCE MINISTER TO BE APPLICABLE WITH PROSPECTIVE EFFECT. M/S. ASHAPURA CLAYTECH LTD. 4 35. SECTION 32 (2) OF THE ACT WAS AMENDED BY FINANCE ACT, 2001 AND THE PROVISION SO AMENDED READS AS UNDER : - WHERE, IN THE ASSESSMENT OF THE ASSESSEE, FULL EFFECT CANNOT BE GIVEN TO ANY ALLOWANCE UNDER SUB - SECTION (1) IN ANY PREVIOUS YEAR, OWING TO THERE BEING NO PROFITS OR GAINS CHARGEABLE FOR THAT PREVIOUS YEAR, OR OWING TO THE PROFITS OR GAINS CHARGEABLE FOR THAT PREVIOUS YEAR, OWING TO THE PROFITS OR GAINS CHARGEABLE BEING LESS THAN THE ALLOWANCE, THEN, SUBJECT TO THE PROVISIONS OF SUB - SECTION (2) OF SECTION 72 AND SUB - SECTION (3) OF SECTION 73, THE ALLOWANCE OR THE PART OF THE ALLOWANCE TO WHICH EFFECT HAS NOT BEEN GIVEN, AS THE CASE MAY BE, SHALL BE ADDED TO THE AMOUNT OF THE ALLOWANCE FOR DEPRECIATION FOR THE FOLLOWING PREVIOUS YEAR AND DEEMED TO BE PART OF T HAT ALLOWANCE, OR IF THERE IS NO SUCH ALLOWANCE FOR THAT PREVIOUS YEAR, BE DEEMED TO BE ALLOWANCE OF THAT PREVIOUS YEAR, AND SO ON FOR THE SUCCEEDING PREVIOUS YEARS. 36. THE PURPOSE OF THIS AMENDMENT HAS BEEN CLARIFIED BY CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES I N THE CIRCULAR NO.14 OF 2001. THE RELEVANT PORTION OF THE SAID CIRCULAR READS AS UNDER : - MODIFICATION OF PROVISIONS RELATING TO DEPRECIATION 30.1 UNDER THE EXISTING PROVISIONS OF SECTION 32 OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT, CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF UNABSORB ED DEPRECIATION IS ALLOWED FOR 8 ASSESSMENT YEARS. 30.2 WITH A VIEW TO ENABLE THE INDUSTRY TO CONSERVE SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO REPLACE PLANT AND MACHINERY, SPECIALLY IN AN ERA WHERE OBSOLESCENCE TAKES PLACE SO OFTEN, THE ACT HAS DISPENSED WITH THE RESTRICTIO N OF 8 YEARS FOR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION. THE ACT HAS ALSO CLARIFIED THAT IN COMPUTING THE PROFITS AND GAINS OF BUSINESS OR PROFESSION FOR ANY PREVIOUS YEAR, DEDUCTION OF DEPRECIATION UNDER SECTION 32 SHALL BE MANDATORY. 30.3 UNDER THE EXISTING PROVISIONS, NO DEDUCTION FOR DEPRECIATION IS ALLOWED ON ANY MOTOR CAR MANUFACTURED OUTSIDE INDIA UNLESS IT IS USED (I) IN THE BUSINESS OF RUNNING IT ON HIRE FOR TOURISTS, OR (II) OUTSIDE IN THE ASSESSEES BUSINESS OR PROFESSION IN ANOTH ER COUNTRY. 30.4 THE ACT HAS ALLOWED DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE ON ALL IMPORTED MOTOR CARS ACQUIRED ON OR AFTER 1ST APRIL, 2001. 30.5 THESE AMENDMENTS WILL TAKE EFFECT FROM THE 1ST APRIL, 2002, AND WILL, ACCORDINGLY, APPLY IN RELATION TO THE ASSESSMENT YEA R 2002 - 03 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. M/S. ASHAPURA CLAYTECH LTD. 5 37. THE CBDT CIRCULAR CLARIFIES THE INTENT OF THE AMENDMENT THAT IT IS FOR ENABLING THE INDUSTRY TO CONSERVE SUFFICIENT FUNDS TO REPLACE PLANT AND MACHINERY AND ACCORDINGLY THE AMENDMENT DISPENSES WITH THE RESTRICTION OF 8 YEARS FOR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF OF UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION. THE AMENDMENT IS APPLICABLE FROM ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002 - 03 AND SUBSEQUENT YEARS. THIS MEANS THAT ANY UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION AVAILABLE TO AN ASSESSEE ON 1ST DAY OF APRIL, 2002 (A.Y. 2002 - 03) WILL BE DEALT WITH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 32(2) AS AMENDED BY FINANCE ACT, 2001 AND NOT BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 32(2) AS IT STOOD BEFORE THE SAID AMENDMENT. HAD THE INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE BEEN TO ALLOW THE UNABSORBED DEPREC IATION ALLOWANCE WORKED OUT IN A.Y. 1997 - 98 ONLY FOR EIGHT SUBSEQUENT ASSESSMENT YEARS EVEN AFTER THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 32(2) BY FINANCE ACT, 2001 IT WOULD HAVE INCORPORATED A PROVISION TO THAT EFFECT. HOWEVER, IT DOES NOT CONTAIN ANY SUCH PROVISION. HE NCE KEEPING IN VIEW THE PURPOSE OF AMENDMENT OF SECTION 32(2) OF THE ACT, A PURPOSIVE AND HARMONIOUS INTERPRETATION HAS TO BE TAKEN. WHILE CONSTRUING TAXING STATUTES, RULE OF STRICT INTERPRETATION HAS TO BE APPLIED, GIVING FAIR AND REASONABLE CONSTRUCTION TO THE LANGUAGE OF THE SECTION WITHOUT LEANING TO THE SIDE OF ASSESSEE OR THE REVENUE. BUT IF THE LEGISLATURE FAILS TO EXPRESS CLEARLY AND THE ASSESSEE BECOMES ENTITLED FOR A BENEFIT WITHIN THE AMBIT OF THE SECTION BY THE CLEAR WORDS USED IN THE SECTION, T HE BENEFIT ACCRUING TO THE ASSESSEE CANNOT BE DENIED. HOWEVER, CIRCULAR NO.14 OF 2001 HAD CLARIFIED THAT UNDER SECTION 32(2), IN COMPUTING THE PROFITS AND GAINS OF BUSINESS OR PROFESSION FOR ANY PREVIOUS YEAR, DEDUCTION OF DEPRECIATION UNDER SECTION 32 SHA LL BE MANDATORY. THEREFORE, THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 32(2) AS AMENDED BY FINANCE ACT, 2001 WOULD ALLOW THE UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE AVAILABLE IN THE A.Y. 1997 - 98, 1999 - 2000, 2000 - 01 AND 2001 - 02 TO BE CARRIED FORWARD TO THE SUCCEEDING YEARS, AND I F ANY UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION OR PART THEREOF COULD NOT BE SET OFF TILL THE A.Y. 2002 - 03 THEN IT WOULD BE CARRIED FORWARD TILL THE TIME IT IS SET OFF AGAINST THE PROFITS AND GAINS OF SUBSEQUENT YEARS. 38. THEREFORE, IT CAN BE SAID THAT, CURRENT DEPRECIAT ION IS DEDUCTIBLE IN THE FIRST PLACE FROM THE INCOME OF THE BUSINESS TO WHICH IT RELATES. IF SUCH DEPRECIATION AMOUNT IS LARGER THAN THE AMOUNT OF THE PROFITS OF THAT BUSINESS, THEN SUCH EXCESS COMES FOR ABSORPTION FROM THE PROFITS AND GAINS FROM ANY OTHER BUSINESS OR BUSINESS, IF ANY, CARRIED ON BY THE ASSESSEE. IF A BALANCE IS LEFT EVEN THEREAFTER, THAT BECOMES DEDUCTIBLE FROM OUT OF INCOME FROM ANY SOURCE UNDER ANY OF THE OTHER HEADS OF INCOME DURING THAT YEAR. IN CASE THERE IS A STILL BALANCE LEFT OVER, IT IS TO BE TREATED AS UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION AND IT IS TAKEN TO THE NEXT SUCCEEDING YEAR. WHERE THERE IS CURRENT DEPRECIATION FOR SUCH SUCCEEDING YEAR THE UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION IS ADDED TO THE CURRENT DEPRECIATION FOR SUCH SUCCEEDING YEAR AND IS DEEME D AS PART THEREOF. IF, HOWEVER, THERE IS NO CURRENT DEPRECIATION FOR SUCH SUCCEEDING YEAR, THE M/S. ASHAPURA CLAYTECH LTD. 6 UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION BECOMES THE DEPRECIATION ALLOWANCE FOR SUCH SUCCEEDING YEAR. WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT ANY UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION AVAILABLE TO AN ASSESSEE ON 1ST DAY OF APRIL 2002 (A.Y. 2002 - 03) WILL BE DEALT WITH IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 32(2) AS AMENDED BY FINANCE ACT, 2001. AND ONCE THE CIRCULAR NO.14 OF 2001 CLARIFIED THAT THE RESTRICTION OF 8 YEARS FOR CARRY FORWARD AN D SET OFF OF UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION HAD BEEN DISPENSED WITH, THE UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION FROM A.Y.1997 - 98 UPTO THE A.Y.2001 - 02 GOT CARRIED FORWARD TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2002 - 03 AND BECAME PART THEREOF, IT CAME TO BE GOVERNED BY THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 32(2) AS AMENDED BY FINANCE ACT, 2001 AND WERE AVAILABLE FOR CARRY FORWARD AND SET OFF AGAINST THE PROFITS AND GAINS OF SUBSEQUENT YEARS, WITHOUT ANY LIMIT WHATSOEVER. 5. IN VIEW OF THE DECISION RENDERED BY HON'BLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT, WE FIND MERIT IN THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE. IN OUR VIEW, THE DECISION RENDERED BY HONBLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT, BEING HIGHER JUDICIAL AUTHORITY, SHOULD BE PREFERRED OVER THE DECISION RENDERED BY THE SPECIAL BENCH. ACCORDINGLY, WE SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED CIT(A ) ON THIS ISSUE AND DIRECT THE ASSESSING OFFICER TO ALLOW SET OFF UNABSORBED DEPRECIATION RELATING TO A.Y S . 1998 - 99 & 1999 - 2000 AS CLAIMED BY THE ASSESSEE. 6. SINCE WE HAVE DECIDED THE ISSUE CONTESTED ON MERIT IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE, WE DO NOT FIND IT NECESSARY TO ADJUDICATE THE ISSUE RELATING TO VALIDITY OF INITIATION OF REASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS. 7. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS TREATED AS ALLOWED. ORDER HAS BE EN PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 7 . 0 5 .201 8 . SD/ - SD/ - (PAWAN SINGH ) (B.R .BASKARAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED : 7 / 0 5 / 20 1 8 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT( A) 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI M/S. ASHAPURA CLAYTECH LTD. 7 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// SENIOR P RIVATE S ECRETARY PS ITAT, MUMBAI