IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, RANCHI BENCH, RANCHI BEFORE SHRI N.S SAINI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND PAVAN KUMAR GADALE, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO.52 /RAN/201 6 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2006 - 2007 SHRI SHAJIMAN JOSEPH, C/O. M/S. L.N. MALICK & CO., CAS, 18/13, WEA KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI. VS. ITO, WARD 3(2), RANCHI. PAN/GIR NO. ADJPJ 7296 F (APPELLANT ) .. ( RESPONDENT ) ASSESSEE BY: NONE REVENUE BY : SHRI A.K.MOHANTY, JCIT DATE OF HEARING : 22 /05 / 201 8 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 24 /05/ 2018 O R D E R PER N.S.SAINI, AM THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE CIT(A) - RANCHI, DATED 11.6.2015 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006 - 07. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS INITIALLY FIXED FOR HEARING ON 20.2.2018 AND AT THE REQUEST OF LD A.R. OF T HE ASSESSEE, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED TO 28.2.2018. 2 ITA NO.52/RAN/2016 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006 - 2007 ON THE SAID ALSO, NONE WAS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. THEREFORE, THE HEARING WAS ADJOURNED SINE DIE. NOTICE OF HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY RPAD BUT THE SAME WAS RETURNED BACK UNSERVE D BY THE POSTAL AUTHORITIES WITH THE REMARKS INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS. THE ASSESSEE HAS NOT PROVIDED THE CORRECT ADDRESS TO THE TRIBUNAL FOR SERVICE OF NOTICE OF HEARING. FROM THE ABOVE CONDUCT OF THE ASSESSEE, WE INFER THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNA L. HE NCE, WE DISMISS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IN LIMINE 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24 /05 /201 8 SD/ - SD/ - (PAVAN KUMAR GADALE) (N.S SAINI) JUDICIAL MEMBER A CCOUNTANT MEMBER RANCHI; DATED 24 /05 /201 8 B.K.PARIDA, SPS COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, SR.PS, ITAT, CAMP AT RANCHI 1. THE APPELLANT : SHRI SHAJIMAN JOSEPH, C/O. M/S. L.N. MALICK & CO., CAS, 18/13, WEA KAROL BAGH, NEW DELHI. 2. THE RESPONDENT: ITO, WARD 3(2), RANCHI 3. THE CIT(A), RANCHI 4. PR. CIT , RANCHI 5. DR, ITAT, RANCHI 6. GUARD FILE. //TRUE COPY//