IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH : BANGALORE BEFORE SHRI N.V. VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ABRAHAM P. GEORGE, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.524/BANG/2015 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11 THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 1(1)(1), BANGALORE. VS. M/S ASM TECHNOLOGIES LTD., # 80/2, LUSANNE COURT, RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE 560 025. PAN : AABCA 4362P APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : SHRI SUNIL KUMAR AGARWAL, JT. CIT(DR) RESPONDENT BY : SHRI SURESH MUTHUKRISHNAN, CA DATE OF HEARING : 27.07.2015 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 30.07.2015 O R D E R PER N.V. VASUDEVAN, JUDICIAL MEMBER THIS APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS AGAINST THE ORDER DA TED 23.02.2015 OF THE CIT(APPEALS)-I, BANGALORE RELATING TO ASSESSMEN T YEAR 2010-11. 2. THE ONLY ISSUE THAT ARISES FOR CONSIDERATION IN THIS APPEAL IS AS TO WHETHER THE CIT(APPEALS) WAS JUSTIFIED IN DIRECTING THE AO TO EXCLUDE THE ITA NO.524/BANG/2015 PAGE 2 OF 3 REVENUE FROM DEPUTATION OF STAFF AND OTHER FOREIGN CURRENCY EXPENSES ATTRIBUTABLE TO DELIVERY OF SOFTWARE OUTSIDE INDIA FROM THE TOTAL TURNOVER ALSO WHILE COMPUTING DEDUCTION U/S. 10A OF THE ACT. 3. ACCORDING TO THE AO, AS PER THE DEFINITION OF EX PORT TURNOVER GIVEN IN CLAUSE (IV) TO EXPLANATION 2, THE ABOVE INCOME/EXPE NSES ARE EXPENSES INCURRED FOR FREIGHT ATTRIBUTABLE TO THE DELIVERY O F THE PRODUCT OR SOFTWARE OUTSIDE INDIA AND SHOULD BE REDUCED FROM THE EXPORT TURNOVER. HOWEVER, THE PROVISIONS OF SECTION 10A DO NOT PROVIDE FOR EX CLUSION OF SUCH EXPENDITURE FROM TOTAL TURNOVER. IN THE ABSENCE OF A DEFINITION FOR TOTAL TURNOVER IN SECTION 10A, THE NORMAL DEFINITION OF T OTAL TURNOVER HAS TO BE ADOPTED AND AS SUCH THE EXPENSES WHICH ARE REDUCED FROM THE EXPORT TURNOVER IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE SPECIFIC DEFINITION CANNOT BE REDUCED FROM THE TOTAL TURNOVER. 4. ON APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE, THE CIT(APPEALS) FOLL OWING THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN THE CASE OF CIT V. TATA ELXSI LTD., 349 ITR 98 (KARN) , HELD THAT WHATEVER IS EXCLUDED FROM THE EXPORT TURNOVER, HAS ALSO TO BE EXCLUDED FROM THE TOTAL TU RNOVER. 5. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDER OF THE CIT(APPEALS), THE REVENUE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL. 6. THE ONLY GRIEVANCE OF THE REVENUE IS THAT THE DE CISION OF HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA IN TATA ELXSI (SUPRA) HAS NOT ATTAINED FINALITY AND ITA NO.524/BANG/2015 PAGE 3 OF 3 A SLP BY THE DEPARTMENT IS PENDING BEFORE THE HON'B LE SUPREME COURT. WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT AS OF TODAY, LAW DECLARED B Y THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA WHICH IS THE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IS BINDING ON US. WE THEREFORE HOLD THAT THE ORDER OF CIT(A) DOES NOT CA LL FOR ANY INTERFERENCE AND ACCORDINGLY THE SAME IS CONFIRMED. 7. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL BY THE REVENUE IS DISM ISSED. PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 30 TH DAY OF JULY, 2015. SD/- SD/- ( ABRAHAM P. GEORGE ) ( N.V. VASU DEVAN ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL M EMBER BANGALORE, DATED, THE 30 TH JULY, 2015. /D S/ COPY TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENTS 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT, BANGALORE. 6. GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR / SENIOR PRIVATE SECRETARY ITAT, BANGALORE.