, , , , , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES D, MUMBAI .. , ! ' # , $ ', % BEFORE SHRI R.S.SYAL, AM AND SHRI VIVEK VARMA, JM ITA NO.524/MUM/2011 : ASST.YEAR 2005-2006 M/S.RIVERGROVE TRADING PRIVATE LIMITED 94 MAKER CHAMBERS VI, NARIMAN POINT, MUMBAI 400 023. PAN : AABCR6996G. THE ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX OSD 3(3) MUMBAI. ( &' / // / APPELLANT) ) ) ) ) / VS. ( *+&'/ RESPONDENT) &' , ,, , - - - - / APPELLANT BY : --- NONE --- *+&' , - , - , - , - / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI NIRAJ BANSAL ) , .! / / / / DATE OF HEARING : 10.09.2013 /01 , .! / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 11.09.2013 ' 2 ' 2 ' 2 ' 2 / / / / O R D E R PER R.S.SYAL (AM) : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE ARISES OUT OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX (APPEALS) ON 16.11.2010 RELATES TO THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2005-2006. 2. THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 10.09.2013. HOWEVER, DESPITE NOTICE, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSE SSEE NOR HAS IT MOVED ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT. IT IS, THERE FORE, PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING ITS APPEAL. ACCORDINGLY, BY APPLYING THE RATIO LAID DOWN BY THE ITAT DELHI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P.) LTD. [(1991) 38 ITD 320], WE DISMISS THE APPEAL FILED BY THE APPELLANT-ASSES SEE AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. ITA NO.524/MUM/2011. M/S.RIVERGROVE TRADING PVT.LTD. 2 3. 3 .4 $) 3. , 5 !36 , 6. 78 IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 11 TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2013. ' 2 , /01 9')4 0 , : SD/- SD/- (VIVEK VARMA) (R.S.SYAL) $ ' $ ' $ ' $ ' / JUDICIAL MEMBER ! ' ! ' ! ' ! ' / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI ; 9') DATED : 11 TH SEPTEMBER, 2013. DEVDAS* ' 2 , *$.;# < #1. ' 2 , *$.;# < #1. ' 2 , *$.;# < #1. ' 2 , *$.;# < #1./ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. &' / THE APPELLANT 2. *+&' / THE RESPONDENT. 3. = () / THE CIT, MUMBAI. 4. = / CIT(A) 7, MUMBAI. 5. #@: *$.$) , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. : A / GUARD FILE. ' 2) ' 2) ' 2) ' 2) / BY ORDER, +#. *$. //TRUE COPY// B B B B/ // /7 6 7 6 7 6 7 6 ( DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , , , , / ITAT, MUMBAI