IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH C, NEW DELHI BEFORE : SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 5301/DEL./2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2006-07 CANE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, C/O DS KOHLI, ADVOCATE, F-06, 1 ST FLOOR, NARAYAN TOWER, GANDHI LANE, GOLGHAR, GORAKHPUR. PAN-AAALC0276E (APPELLANT) VS. D.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 1, MUZAFFARNAGAR. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SH. ARUN KUMAR YADAV, SR. DR ORDER PER L.P. SAHU, A.M.: THE ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAI NST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A), MUZAFFARNAGAR DATED 25.06.2016 PASS ED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07. 2. NONE IS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPIT E THE DATE OF HEARING WAS FIXED FOR 07.11.2017 ON THE WRITTEN REQUEST OF ASSESSEES COUNSEL AND WAS INTIMATED TO BOTH THE PARTIES IN THE COURT ITSELF. HOWEVER, THERE IS NO REPRESENTATION ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR IS THE RE ANY WRITTEN REQUEST FOR DATE OF HEARING 07.11.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 07.11.2017 5301/DEL./2014 2 ADJOURNMENT ON RECORD. IT APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF TH E ASSESSEE DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION IN VIEW OF THE ORDERS OF T RIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTI PLAN INDIA (P) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL. ) AND OF M.P. HIGH COURT IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 48 0 (MP). 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED, AS INDIC ATED ABOVE. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 07.11.2017 . SD/- SD/- (H.S. SIDHU) (L.P. SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 07.11.2017 *AKS* COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) COMMISSIONER (4) CIT(A) (5) DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI