Firoz Qureshi, Meerut V. ITO, Ward-1(2), Meerut

ITA 5366/DEL/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 126 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3592 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 10 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 01-02-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 21-08-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: SAMPOORANANAND

Judgement Text

PAGE 1 OF 2 IN THE INCOME TAX APPELATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH SMC: NEW DELHI BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NOS. 5366 & 5367/DEL/2017 A.YRS.: 2009-10 & 2014-15 SH. FIROZ QURESHI, VS. ITO, WARD 1(2), C/O VINOD KUMAR GOEL, MEERUT 282, BOUNDARY ROAD, CIVIL LINES, MEERUT (PAN: AAEPQ0996P) (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) ASSESSEE BY : NONE DEPARTMENT BY : SH. SAMPOORANANAND, SR. DR O R D E R PER H.S. SIDHU, JM THESE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGA INST THE ORDER BOTH DATED 11.8.2017 OF THE LD. CIT(A), MEERUT R ELEVANT TO ASSESSMENT YEARS 2009-10 & 2014-15 RESPECTIVELY. 2. IN THIS CASES THE NOTICES WERE SENT TO THE ASSESS EE FOR HEARING FOR TODAY I.E. 30.01.2018 AT THE ADDRESS MENTIONED I N FORM NO. 36 VIDE COLUMN NO. 10. 3. ON 30.01.2018, NEITHER THE ASSESSEE NOR HIS AUTHORI SED REPRESENTATIVE ATTENDED THE HEARING AND ALSO NOT FILE D ANY APPLICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT, HENCE, I AM OF THE VIEW THAT NO USEFUL PURPOSE WOULD BE SERVED TO SERVE THE NOTICE AGAIN AND AGAIN. IN VIEW OF ABOVE, IT IS THUS INFERRED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTION OF HIS APPEALS. 4. HAVING REGARD TO RULE 19(2) OF ITAT RULES AND FOLL OWING VARIOUS DECISIONS OF DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL INCLUDING T HAT OF MULTIPLAN PAGE 2 OF 2 INDIA LTD. : 38 ITD 320 (DELHI) AND HONBLE MADHYA PRAD ESH HIGH COURTS DECISION IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT; 223 ITR 480 (MP), I TREAT THIS APPEALS AS UNADMITTED AND DISM ISS THE SAME. I WOULD LIKE TO CLARIFY THAT SUBSEQUENTLY IF THE ASSE SSEE EXPLAINS THE REASONS FOR NON APPEARANCE AND IF THE BENCH IS SO SAT ISFIED, THE MATTER MAY BE RECALLED FOR THE PURPOSE OF ADJUDICATION OF THE APPEALS. 5. IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE A RE DISMISSED IN LIMINE. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON 01-02-2018. SD/- [H.S. SIDHU] JUDICIAL MEMBER DATE:01/02/2018 SRBHATNAGAR COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4.CIT (A) 5. DR , ITAT TRUE COPY BY ORDER, ASSISTANT REGISTRAR, ITAT, DELHI BENCHES