M/s Bankura Unnayani Institute of Engineering, Bankura V. ACIT Circle - Bankura, Bankura, Bankura

ITA 547/KOL/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3329 (ITAT-KOLKATA)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 5 month(s) 3 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 24-08-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Partly Allowed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 21-03-2017
• Result in Favour of: Partly Allowed
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Depreciation; Charitable institution
• Section: 32; 11

Judgement Text

ITA NO.547/KOL/2017 [ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2008-09] PAGE | 2 4. AFTER HEARING RIVAL CONTENTIONS, WE FIND THAT THE ISSUE THAT ARISES IN GROUND NO.6 IS COVERED BY THE DECISION OF HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF CIT-III, PUNE VS RAJASTHAN & GUJARATI CHARITABLE FOUNDATION POONA DATED 19.12.2017 WHEREIN IT IS HELD AS FOLLOWS:- ............THE COURT REJECTED THIS ARGUMENT. IT WAS HELD THAT NORMAL DEPRECIATION CAN BE CONSIDERED AS A LEGITIMATE DEDUCTION IN COMPUTING THE REAL INCOME OF THE ASSESSEE ON GENERAL PRINCIPLES OR UNDER SECTION 11(1)(A) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT. THE COURT REJECTED THE ARGUMENT ON BEHALF OF THE REVENUE THAT SECTION 32 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT WAS THE ONLY SECTION GRANTING BENEFIT OF DEDUCTION ON ACCOUNT OF DEPRECIATION. IT WAS HELD THAT INCOME OF CHARITABLE TRUST DERIVED FROM BUILDING, PLANT AND MACHINERY AND FURNITURE WAS LIABLE TO BE COMPUTED IN NORMAL COMMERCIAL MANNER ALTHOUGH THE TRUST MAY NOT BE CARRYING ON ANY BUSINESS AND THE ASSETS IN RESPECT WHEREOF DEPRECIATION IS CLAIMED BY NOT BE BUSINESS ASSETS. IN ALL SUCH CASES, SECTION 32 OF THE INCOME TAX ACT PROVIDING FOR DEPRECIATION FOR COMPUTATION OF INCOME DERIVED FROM BUSINESS OR PROFESSION IS NOT APPLICABLE. HOWEVER, THE INCOME OF THE TRUST IS REQUIRED TO BE COMPUTED UNDER SECTION 11 ON COMMERCIAL PRINCIPLES AFTER PROVIDING FOR ALLOWANCE FOR NORMAL DEPRECIATION AND DEDUCTION THEREOF FROM GROSS INCOME OF THE TRUST. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID JUDGEMENT OF THE BOMBAY HIGH COURT, WE ANSWER QUESTION NO.1 IN THE AFFIRMATIVE I.E., IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE AND AGAINST THE DEPARTMENT. 5. RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE SAME, WE ALLOW THIS GROUND OF THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE. 6. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED IN PART. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 24.08.2018. SD/- SD/- (S.S.VISWANETHRA RAVI) (J.SUDHAKAR REDDY) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATE:-24.08.2018 *AMIT KUMAR*