Arun Kumar, PANIPAT V. Pr. CIT , Rohtak

ITA 568/DEL/2021

AI Insights

The case involves an appeal by Arun Kumar, the proprietor of Sugan Chand Adish Kumar Aggarwal Mandi, against an order dated 11.03.2021 framed under section 263 of the Income Tax Act by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Pr. CIT), Rohtak. The specifics of the dispute were not detailed in the provided document, but it is noted that the appeal was dismissed as withdrawn by the assessee's authorized representative.

• Counselvise Citation: [2023] 140 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 115939 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 11 month(s) 24 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 17-05-2023
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Next Hearing Date: 17-05-2023
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 23-05-2021
• Laws Referred To: Income Tax Act
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘A’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. N. K. BILLAIYA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. C.N. PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA No.568/Del/2021 Assessment Year: 2011-12 Arun Kumar Prop. Sugan Chand Adish Kumar Aggarwal Mandi Panipat, Haryana -132103 PAN No. ACUPK2051P Vs Pr. CIT Rohtak (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Appellant by None Respondent by Sh. P. Praveen Sidharth, CIT DR Date of hearing: 18/05/2023 Date of Pronouncement: 18/05/2023 ORDER PER N. K. BILLAIYA, AM: This appeal by the assessee is preferred against the order dated 11.03.2021 framed u/s.263 of the Act by the Pr. CIT, Rohtak. 2. The authorized representative of the assessee moved the following application :- 2 3 3. In the light of the above the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Decision announced in the open court on 17.05.2023. Sd/- Sd/- [C.N. PRASAD] [N.K. BILLAIYA] JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Dated:17.05.2023 *Neha* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CITi 4. CIT(A) 5. DR Asst. Registrar ITAT, New Delhi