IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B, BENC H KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM ./ITA NO.594/KOL/2019 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012-13) M/S PREMIER SERVICES LTD. C/O SUBASH AGARWAL & ASSOCIATES, ADVOCATES SIDDHA GIBSON 1, GIBSON LANE, SUITE 213, 2 ND FLOOR, KOLKATA-700069. VS. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2), KOLKATA ./ ./PAN/GIR NO.: AABCP 9041 L (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI SUBASH AGARWAL, ADVOCATE RESPONDENT BY : SMT. RANU BISWAS, ADDL. CIT / DATE OF HEARING : 31/10/2019 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13/11/2019 / O R D E R PER BENCH: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE , PE RTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2012-13, IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY TH E COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-17, KOLKATA, WHICH IN TURN ARISES OUT OF A N ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER U/S 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT) DATED 11/03/2015. M/S PREMIER SERVICES LTD. ITA NO.594/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2012-13 P PP PA AA AG GG GE EE E | || | 2 22 2 2. AT THE OUTSET ITSELF, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE AS SESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT REPRESENT HIS CASE BEFORE LD. CIT(A) AS T HE NOTICE WAS NOT SERVED TO THE ASSESSEE DURING THE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS AND THE ORDER BEING AN EX-PARTE ORDER, STOOD VITIATED ON ACCOUNT OF VIOLATION OF PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE CONTENDED THAT IN THE INTE REST OF JUSTICE, ANOTHER OPPORTUNITY TO CONTEST THE APPEAL BEFORE THE LD. FI RST APPELLATE AUTHORITY MAY BE GRANTED TO THE ASSESSEE. 3. WE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND CAREFULLY GONE THR OUGH THE SUBMISSION PUT FORTH ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ALONG WITH THE DOCUMENTS FURNISHED AND THE CASE LAWS RELIED UPON, AND PERUSED THE FACT OF THE CASE INCLU DING THE FINDINGS OF THE LD CIT(A) AND OTHER MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. WE N OTE THAT THE LD. CIT(A) DID NOT CONSIDER THE ASSESSMENT RECORDS WHILE ADJUDICATING THE ISSUE. WE NOTE THAT THE LD. CIT(A) DID NOT DISCUSS THE ASSESSEES CASE ON MERIT S BASED ON THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE BEFORE HIM HENCE IT IS A VIOLATION OF PRI NCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE. THE LD. COUNSEL SUBMITTED BEFORE US AN AFFIDAVIT STATING TH AT OFFICE OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY HAD SHIFTED TO NEW ADDRESS AT 405, PRESTIGE CHAMBERS, KALYAN STREET, MASJIT (EAST), MUMBAI-400009 FROM THE EARLIER OLD A DDRESS; BUT INADVERTENTLY NO INTIMATION HAD BEEN MADE REGARDING CHANGE OF ADDRES S TO THE OFFICE OF THE LD. CIT(A). WE NOTE THAT IT IS SETTLED LAW THAT PRINCI PLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND FAIR PLAY REQUIRE THAT THE EFFECTED PARTY IS GRANTED SUF FICIENT OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD TO CONTEST HIS CASE. WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT ONE MO RE OPPORTUNITY SHOULD BE GIVEN TO THE ASSESSEE TO PLEAD HIS CASE BEFORE LD. CIT(A) . THEREFORE, WITHOUT DELVING MUCH DEEPER INTO THE MERITS OF THE CASE, IN THE INT EREST OF JUSTICE, WE RESTORE THE MATTER BACK TO THE FILE OF LD. CIT(A) FOR DE NOVO A DJUDICATION AND PASS A SPEAKING ORDER AFTER AFFORDING SUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY OF BEI NG HEARD TO THE ASSESSEE, WHO IN TURN, IS ALSO DIRECTED TO CONTEST HIS STAND FORTHWI TH. THEREFORE, WE DEEM IT FIT AND PROPER TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) AND REMIT THE MATTER BACK TO THE FILE OF THE LD. CIT(A) TO ADJUDICATE THE ISSUE AFRESH ON MERITS. FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. M/S PREMIER SERVICES LTD. ITA NO.594/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2012-13 P PP PA AA AG GG GE EE E | || | 3 33 3 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALL OWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 13.1 1.2019 SD/- ( S.S.GODARA ) SD/- (A.L.SAINI) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /KOLKATA; / DATE: 13/11/2019 ( SB, SR.PS ) COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. M/S PREMIER SERVICES LTD. 2. DCIT, CIRCLE-1(2), KOLKATA 3. C.I.T(A)- 4. C.I.T.- KOLKATA. 5. CIT(DR), KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA. 6. GUARD FILE. TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSIST ANT REGISTRAR ITAT, KOLKA TA BENCHES