Balbir Saini Prop. of Om Swastika handmade Paper Corp, 04, Love Kush Nagar-1, Mangyawas Road infront of Maharani Restaurant, Jaipur, Jaipur V. ITO Ward-1(3), Jaipur, Ward-1(3), Jaipur

ITA 607/JPR/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 110 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8489 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 10 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-07-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 30-04-2019
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: CHANCHAL MEENA ACIT

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,A JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA. NO. 607/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2008-09 SHRI BALBIR SAINI PROP. OF OM SWASTIKA HANDMADE PAPER CORP. PLOT.04, LOVE KUSH NAGAR-1, MANGYAWAS ROAD INFRONT OF MAHARANI RESTAURANT, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-1(3), JAIPUR. TOLFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: BVDPS 4929 K VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : MISS. CHANCHAL MEENA (ACIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 10/07/2020 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT :10/07/2020 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THE PRESENT APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 12.02.2019 FOR THE ASSESSMEN T YEAR 2008-09. 2. NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. TH E ASSESSEE HAS MOVED AN APPLICATION DATED 30.06.2020 THROUGH HIS A DVOCATE AND AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, SHRI CHANDRA MANOHAR BAT WARA STATING THAT HE DESIRES TO SUBMIT A PETITION UNDER VIVAD SE VIS HWAS SCHEME-2020 ITA NO. 607/JP/2019 SHRI BALBIR SAINI VS ITO 2 TO SETTLE THE AFORESAID MATTER AND HAS ACCORDINGLY REQUESTED THAT HE MAY BE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THE PRESENT APPEAL. 3. THE LD. DR IS HEARD WHO DID NOT RAISE ANY SPECI FIC OBJECTION IN ACCEPTING THE SAID PRAYER OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEAL B Y THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN VIEW OF ABOVE, THE PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE IS ACCEPTED AND THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN BY THE ASSESSEE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10 /07/2020. SD/- SD/- FOT; IKY JKO FOE FLAG ;KNO (VIJAY PAL RAO) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 10/07/2020. *SANTOSH VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SHRI BALBIR SAINI, JAINPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-1(3), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE { ITA NO. 607/JP/2019} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR