VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCH A, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKWO] U;KF;D LNL; ,O A JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA- @ ITA NO. 61/JP/2019 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z @ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2010-11. SMT. SUNILA RAO FLAT NO. 1, 285/15, MILAN APARTMENTS, KOREGAON PARK, NEAR PARK CENTRAL HOTEL, PUNE. CUKE VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 6(4), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO. AAJPR 9203 P VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI ARPIT GUPTA (CA) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : MS CHANCHAL MEENA (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 14.02.2020. ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 14/02/2020. VKNS'K@ ORDER PER VIJAY PAL RAO, JM : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST TH E ORDER DATED 19.11.2018 OF LD. CIT (APPEALS), AJMER FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 10-11. 2. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE HAS STATED AT BAR THAT THE ASSESSEE VIDE HER LETTER DATED 28-01-2020 DOES NOT WANT TO PURSUE THIS APPEAL AND, THEREFORE, REQUESTED TO PERMIT THE ASSESSEE TO WITHDRAW THE PRESENT APPEAL. THE LD. D/R HAS RAISED NO OBJECTION IF THE APPEAL O F THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. 2 ITA NO. 61/JP/2019. SMT. SUNILA RAO, PUNE 3. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISS ED. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 14/02 /2020. SD/- SD/- ( FOE FLAG ;KNO ) ( FOT; IKY JKWO ( VIKRAM SINGH YADAV ) (VIJAY PAL RAO) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER JAIPUR DATED:- 14/02/2020. DAS/ VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. THE APPELLANT- SMT. SUNILA RAO, PUNE. 2. THE RESPONDENT THE ITO WARD 6(4), JAIPUR. 3. THE CIT(A). 4. THE CIT, 5. THE DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 61/JP/2019) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR