IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH C, NEW DELHI BEFORE : SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 6219/DEL./2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11 M/S. G.D. BUILDERS, 201A, APRA PLAZAM PLOT NO. 29, COMMUNITY CENTRE RANI BAGH, PITAMPURA, DELHI PAN-AAAFG2009B (APPELLANT) VS. A.C.I.T., CIRCLE - 38(1), NEW DELHI. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SH. S.R. SENAPATI, SR. DR ORDER PER L.P. SAHU, A.M.: THE ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAI NST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A)-XXVIII, NEW DELHI DATED 10.09.2014 P ASSED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. 2. NONE IS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPIT E THE NOTICE FOR HEARING WAS SENT THROUGH REGISTERED POST AT THE ADDRESS GIV EN IN THE APPEAL PAPERS, WHICH IS DEEMED TO BE SERVED ON THE ASSESSEE, AS NO T RETURNED BACK. NO ANY WRITTEN REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT ON BEHALF OF THE AS SESSEE IS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE I S NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING DATE OF HEARING 17.01.2018 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 17.01.2018 ITA NO. 6219/DEL./2014 2 THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE D ESERVES TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION IN VIEW OF THE ORDERS OF T RIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTI PLAN INDIA (P) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL.) AND OF M.P. HIGH COURT IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (MP). 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED, AS INDIC ATED ABOVE. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 17.01.2018 . SD/- SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) (L.P. SAHU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 17.01.2018 *AKS* COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) COMMISSIONER (4) CIT(A) (5) DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI