IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL (DELHI BENCH: A: NEW DELHI) BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, ACCOUNTANT ME MBER ITA NO:- 6239/DEL/2016 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012-13) ITO, WARD - 3(1), ROOM NO. 381, C.R. BUILDING, I.P. ESTATE, NEW DELHI VS APOORVA LEASING FINANCE AND INVESTMENTS COMPANY LTD., 104-A, SINGLE STOREY, RAMESH NAGAR, NEW DELHI-110015 PAN-AABCA0282A APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY SHRI. SANJAY KAPOOR, SR. DR RESPONDENT BY NONE ORDER PER ANADEE NATH MISSHRA, AM [A]. THIS APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED BY THE REVENUE AGAI NST THE ORDER DATED 4.10.2016 PASSED BY LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF I NCOME TAX(APPEALS)-I, NEW DELHI [IN SHORT LD.CIT(A)] PE RTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. IN THIS APPEAL, THE TAX E FFECT IS LESS THAN THE MONETARY LIMIT FIXED BY THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DI RECT TAXES (IN SHORT CBDT) IN ITS CIRCULAR NO.17/2009 DATED 08.0 8.2019. THE REVENUE HAS RAISED FOLLOWING GROUNDS OF APPEAL:- 1. THE LD. CIT(A) ERRED IN DELETING THE ADDITION OF RS. 95,00,000/- MADE BY THE AO U/S 68 OF THE I.T. ACT, 1961 ITA NO: - 6239/DEL/2016 PAGE | 2 PARTICULARLY WHEN THE ASSESSEE HAS FAILED TO FURNIS H EVIDENCE TO PROVE THE SOURCE OF FUND THE PERSON FROM WHOM SU CH HUGE SHARE CAPITAL / PREMIUM RECEIVED. 1.1. LD. CIT(A) HAS NOT CONSIDERED THE ISSUE RAISED BY THE AO THAT THE INVESTMENT OF HUGE SUM IN THIS COMPANY BY THOSE WITH VERY MEAGER RESOURCES IS NOT PROBABLE. 1.2 LD. CIT(A) OUGHT TO HAVE EXAMINED THE ISSUE FRO M THE POINT OF VIEW OF HUMAN PROBABILITY AS THE ENTRY T HROUGH BANK ACCOUNT IS NOT A CONCLUSIVE PROOF AS OBSERVED BY HO NBLE SUPREME COURT IN CIT VS. P. MOHANAKALA (291 ITR 27 8(SC):- THE TRANSACTIONS THOUGH APPARENT WERE HELD TO BE N OT REAL ONE. MAY BE THE MONEY CAME BY WAY OF BANK CHEQUES AND PA ID THROUGH THE PROCESS OF BANKING TRANSACTION BUT THAT ITSELF IS OF NO CONSEQUENCES. [B]. AT THE OUTSET, IT WAS BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE B Y US, AT THE TIME OF HEARING THAT TAX EFFECT IN THIS APPEAL IS BELOW RS. 50,00,000./-. VIDE RECENT CBDT CIRCULAR NO.17/2019 DATED 08.08.20 19 READ WITH EARLIER CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018, DATED 11.07.20 18, MINIMUM THRESHOLD LIMIT OF TAX EFFECT OF FILING OF APPEALS BY REVENUE IN INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL ('ITAT', FOR SHORT) H AS BEEN ENHANCED TO RS. 50,00,000/-. IN A SUBSEQUENT CLARIF ICATION ISSUED BY CBDT VIDE F.NO. 279/MISC/M-93/2018-ITJ, DATED 20 /08/2019, ITA NO: - 6239/DEL/2016 PAGE | 3 IT HAS BEEN CLARIFIED BY CBDT THAT THE AFORESAID RE VISED MONETARY LIMIT IS ALSO APPLICABLE TO ALL PENDING APPEALS IN ITAT. THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF THE FOREGOING, WE ARE OF THE VIEW THAT THIS APPEAL FILED BY REVENUE IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. ACCORDINGLY THIS APPEA L IS DISMISSED BEING NOT MAINTAINABLE, HAVING REGARD TO AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULAR NO. 17/2019 DATED 08.08.2019 READ WITH AFORESAID CB DT CIRCULAR NO. 3 OF 2018 IN THE LIGHT OF AFORESAID CLARIFICATI ON DATED 20/08/2019. [C]. BEFORE LEAVING, WE CLARIFY THAT REVENUE WILL B E AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL U/S 254(2) O F INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 SEEKING RECALL OF THIS ORDER AND, FOR RESTORATION OF THE APPEAL IF IT IS FOUND THAT THIS APPEAL OF REVENUE IS NOT COVERED BY AFORESAID CBDT CIRCULARS DATED 08.08.2019 AND 11.07.2018. [D]. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL BY REVENUE IS DISMI SSED. OUR DECISION WAS ORALLY PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT AF TER CONCLUSION OF HEARING ON THE DATE OF HEARING. NOW, THIS WRITTE N ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN OPEN COURT ON 19.09.2019 SD/- SD/- (H.S. SIDHU) (ANADEE NA TH MISSHRA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEM BER DATED:19.09.2019 SH ITA NO: - 6239/DEL/2016 PAGE | 4 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. APPELLANT 2. RESPONDENT 3. CIT 4. CIT(APPEALS) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI DRAFT DICTATED 18.09.2019 DRAFT PLACED BEFORE AUTHOR APPROVED DRAFT COMES TO THE SR.PS/PS ORDER SIGNED AND PRONOUNCED ON FILE SENT TO THE BENCH CLERK DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE AR DATE ON WHICH FILE GOES TO THE HEAD CLERK. DATE OF DISPATCH OF ORDER. DATE OF UPLOADING ON THE WEBSITE 19.09.2019