M/s.The parakode Service Co-op Bank, Pathanamthitta V. The ITO, Kollam

ITA 625/COCH/2019

• Counselvise Citation: [2020] 111 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 8844 (ITAT-COCHIN)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 month(s) 5 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 13-01-2020
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: DB
• Next Hearing Date: 13-01-2020
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 07-11-2019
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MRITHUNJAYA SHARMA
• Keywords: Competent authority
• Section: 143(3); 80P; 250; 13; 154

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL COCHIN BENCH, COCHIN BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, AM & SHRI GEORGE GEORGE K, JM ITA NO. 625 /COCH/201 9 : ASST.YEAR 2009 - 2010 IT A NO. 626 /COCH/2019 : ASST.YEAR 2011 - 2012 M/S. THE PARAKODE SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. PARAKODE, ADOOR PATHANAMTHITTA - 691 554. PAN : AAAJT1587B . VS. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER WARD 4 KOLLAM . (APPELLANT / APPLICANT ) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : --- NONE --- RESPONDENT BY : SRI.MRITHUNJAYA SHARMA, SR.DR DATE OF HEARING : 13 .01.2020 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13 .01.2020 O R D E R PER GEORGE GEORGE K, JM : THESE APPEALS AT THE INSTANCE OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAINST ORDERS OF THE CIT(A) , BOTH DATED 15.10.2019 PASSED U/S 154 R.W.S. 250 OF THE INCOME - TAX ACT. THE RELEVANT ASSESSMENT YEARS ARE 2009 - 2010 AND 2011 - 2012. 2. THE BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE ARE AS FOLLOW: THE ASSESSEE IS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES REGISTERED UNDER THE KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969. FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEARS UNDER CONSIDERATION, THE RETURNS OF INCOME WERE FILED DECLARING INCOME OF RS.NIL, AFTER CLAIMING DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. THE ASSESSING OFFICER PASSED ORDERS U/S 143(3) OF THE I.T.ACT, DISALLOWING THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. THE REASONING OF THE AS SESSING OFFICER ITA NO. 625 - 626 / COCH /201 9. M/S. THE PARAKODE SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD. 2 TO DISALLOW THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT WAS THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS DOING THE BUSINESS OF BANKING, AND THEREFORE, IN VIEW OF INSERTION OF SECTION 80P(4) OF THE I.T.ACT WITH EFFECT FROM 01.04.2007, THE ASSESSEE WILL NOT BE ENTITLED TO THE DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT. THE ASSESSING OFFICER ALSO DISALLOWED THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION WITH REGARD TO INTEREST INCOME RECEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE ON INVESTMENTS MADE WITH DISTRICT CO - OPERATIVE BANKS. 3. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDERS OF ASSESSMENT DENYING THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT, THE ASSESSEE PREFERRED APPEALS TO THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY. THE CIT(A) ALLOWED THE APPEALS BY HOLDING THAT THE ASSESSEE WAS ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. THE INTERE ST INCOME RECEIVED FROM OTHER BANKS AND TREASURY ALSO WAS ALLOWED AS DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2)(A)(I) OF THE I.T.ACT. IN ALLOWING THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE, THE CIT(A) FOLLOWED THE JUDGMENT OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERV ICE CO - OPERATIVE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [(2016) 384 ITR 490 (KER.). 4. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE CIT(A) ISSUED NOTICES U/S 154 OF THE I.T.ACT PROPOSING TO RECTIFY HIS ORDERS PASSED, IN VIEW OF THE SUBSEQUENT JUDGMENT OF THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [ITA NO.97/2016 ORDER DATED 19 TH MARCH, 2019]. THE ASSESSEE OBJECTED TO THE ISSUANCE OF NOTICES. HOWEVER, THE CIT(A) REJECTED THE OBJECTIONS RAISED BY ITA NO. 625 - 626 / COCH /201 9. M/S. THE PARAKODE SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD. 3 THE ASSESSEE AND PASSED ORDERS U/S 154 OF THE I.T.ACT, DISALLOWING THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE U/S 8 0P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT. 5. AGGRIEVED BY THE ORDERS OF THE CIT(A), THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED THESE APPEALS BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL RAISING THE FOLLOWING IDENTICAL GROUNDS: - 1. ORDER OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER DISALLOWING DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE INCOME TAX ACT IS OPPOSED TO LAW AND AGAINST JUSTICE. 2. THE ASSESSING OFFICER DENIED THE APPELLANTS CLAIM UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE ACT BASED ON AMENDMENT TO SECTION 80P BY FIN ANCE ACT 2006, BUT THE ASSESSING OFFICER ERRED IN APPRAISING THE AMENDMENT PROPERLY. 3. THE ACT PERMITS DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P TO A PRIMARY CO OPERATIVE SOCIETY WHICH HAS ITS PRIMARY OBJECTIVE TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ACCOMMODATION TO ITS MEMBERS FOR AG RICULTURAL PURPOSES OR FOR PURPOSES CONNECTED WITH AGRICULTURAL ACTIVITIES. THE APPELLANT'S PRIMARY OBJECTIVE IS TO PROVIDE FINANCIAL ACCOMMODATION TO ITS MEMBERS FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES AND IS ELIGIBLE FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P. 4. THE AMENDMENT TO SECTION 80P DO NOT RESTRICT NON AGRICULTURAL SERVICE TO ITS MEMBERS BUT REQUIRES STIPULATION AS THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THE SOCIETY SHOULD BE FOR RENDERING FINANCIAL ACCOMMODATION FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES. 5. THE OBSERVATION BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER IN THIS REGARD IS THAT THE AGRICULTURAL FINANCE BY THE SOCIETY IS ONLY A SMALL PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL LOANS SANCTIONED IS NOT TRUE TO FACTS. 6. ON THE ABOVE GROUNDS AND FURTHER POINTS TO BE RAISED AT THE TIME OF HEARING OF APPEAL THE APPEAL, MAY BE ALLO WED AND JUSTICE RENDERED. 6. NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE, HENCE, WE PROCEED TO DISPOSE OF THE APPEALS ON MERITS AFTER HEARING THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE. ITA NO. 625 - 626 / COCH /201 9. M/S. THE PARAKODE SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD. 4 7. WE HAVE HEARD THE LEARNED DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE AND PERUSED THE M ATERIAL ON RECORD. THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT [(2016) 384 ITR 490 (KER.)] HAD HELD THAT WHEN A CERTIFICATE HAS BEEN ISSUED TO AN ASSESSEE BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OPERATIV E SOCIETIES CHARACTERIZING IT AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY, NECESSARILY, THE DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT HAS TO BE GRANTED TO THE ASSESSEE. HOWEVER, THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OP ERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) HAD REVERSED THE ABOVE FINDINGS OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF CHIRAKKAL SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) . THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE KERALA HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVI LAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) HELD THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN INQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY TO DETERMINE THE ELIGIBILITY OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. IT WAS HE LD BY THE HONBLE HIGH COURT THAT THE ASSESSING OFFICER IS NOT BOUND BY THE REGISTRATION CERTIFICATE ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR OF KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY CLASSIFYING THE ASSESSEE - SOCIETY AS A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY. THE HONBLE HIGH COURT HELD THAT EACH AS SESSMENT YEAR IS SEPARATE AND ELIGIBILITY SHALL BE VERIFIED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER FOR EACH OF THE ASSESSMENT YEARS. THE FINDING OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE HIGH COURT READS AS FOLLOWS: - 33. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1] IT CANNOT BE CONTENDED THAT, WHILE CONSIDERING THE CLAIM MADE BY AN ITA NO. 625 - 626 / COCH /201 9. M/S. THE PARAKODE SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD. 5 ASSESSEE SOCIETY FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, AFTER THE INTRODUCTION OF SUB - SEC TION (4) THEREOF, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO EXTEND THE BENEFITS AVAILABLE, MERELY LOOKING AT THE CLASS OF THE SOCIETY AS PER THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION ISSUED UNDER THE CENTRAL OR STATE CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT AND THE RULES MADE THEREUNDER. ON S UCH A CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIG HT OF THE PROVISIONS UNDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P. 33. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH HELD THAT THE APPELLANT SOCIETIES HAVING BEEN CLASSIFIED AS PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY UNDER THE KCS ACT, I T HAS NECESSARILY TO BE HELD THAT THE PRINCIPAL OBJECT OF SUCH SOCIETIES IS TO UNDERTAKE AGRICULTURAL CREDIT ACTIVITIES AND TO PROVIDE LOANS AND ADVANCES FOR AGRICULTURAL PURPOSES, THE RATE OF INTEREST ON SUCH LOANS AND ADVANCES TO BE AT THE RATE TO BE FIX ED BY THE REGISTRAR OF CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES UNDER THE KCS ACT AND HAVING ITS AREA OF OPERATION CONFINED TO A VILLAGE, PANCHAYAT OR A MUNICIPALITY AND AS SUCH, THEY ARE ENTITLED FOR THE BENEFIT OF SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT TO EASE THEMS ELVES OUT FROM THE COVERAGE OF SECTION 80P AND THAT, THE AUTHORITIES UNDER THE IT ACT CANNOT PROBE INTO ANY ISSUES OR SUCH MATTERS RELATING TO SUCH SOCIETIES AND THAT, PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETIES REGISTERED AS SUCH UNDER THE KCS ACT AND CLASSIFIE D SO, UNDER THE ACT, INCLUDING THE APPELLANTS ARE ENTITLED TO SUCH EXEMPTION. 34. IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] THE DIVISION BENCH EXPRESSED A DIVERGENT OPINION, WITHOUT NOTICING THE LAW LAID DOWN IN ANTONY PATTUKULANGARA [2012 (3) KHC 726] AND PERINTHALMAN NA [363 ITR 268]. MOREOVER, THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BENCH IN CHIRAKKAL [384 ITR 490] IS NOT GOOD LAW, SINCE, IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1], ON A CLAIM FOR DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, BY REASON OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, THE ASSESSING OFFICER HAS TO CONDUCT AN ENQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY AND ARRIVE AT A CONCLUSION WHETHER BENEFITS CAN BE EXTENDED OR NOT IN THE LIG HT OF THE PROVISIONS UNDER SUB - SECTION (4) OF SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN CITIZEN CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY [397 ITR 1] THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE DIVISION BENCH PERINTHALMANNA [363 ITR 268] HAS TO BE AFFIRMED AND WE DO SO. ITA NO. 625 - 626 / COCH /201 9. M/S. THE PARAKODE SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD. 6 35. IN VIEW OF THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE APEX COURT IN ACE MULTI AXES SYSTEMS CASE (SUPRA), SINCE EACH ASSESSMENT YEAR IS A SEPARATE UNIT, THE INTENTION OF THE LEGISLATURE IS IN NO MANNER DEFEATED BY NOT ALLOWING DEDUCTION UNDER SECTION 80P OF THE IT ACT, BY REASON OF SUB - SECTION (4) THEREOF, IF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY CEASES TO BE THE SPECIFIED CLASS OF SOCIETIES FOR WHICH THE DEDUCTION IS PROVIDED, EVEN IF IT WAS ELIGIBLE IN THE INITIAL YEARS. 7.1 THE CIT(A) HAD INITIALLY ALLOWED THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE AND GRANTED DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT. SUBSEQUENTLY, THE CIT(A) PASSED ORDER U/S 154 OF THE I.T.ACT, WHEREIN THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT WAS DENIED, BY RELYING ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE J URISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA). THE CIT(A) OUGHT NOT TO HAVE REJECTED THE CLAIM OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF THE I.T.ACT WITHOUT EXAMINING THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE - SOCIETY. THE FULL BE NCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) HAD HELD THAT THE A.O. HAS TO CONDUCT AN INQUIRY INTO THE FACTUAL SITUATION AS TO THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE SOCIETY TO DETERMINE THE ELIGIBILITY OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT. IN VIEW OF THE DICTUM LAID DOWN BY THE FULL BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT (SUPRA), WE RESTORE THE ISSUE OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) TO THE FILES OF THE ASSESSING OFFICER. THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL EXAMINE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE AND DETERMINE WHETHER THE ACTIVITIES ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE ACTIVITIES OF A CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETY FUNCTIONING UNDER THE KERALA CO - OPERATIVE SOCIETIES ACT, 1969 AND ACCORDINGLY GRANT DEDUCTION U/S 80P(2) OF TH E I.T.ACT. ITA NO. 625 - 626 / COCH /201 9. M/S. THE PARAKODE SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD. 7 7.2 AS REGARDS THE INTEREST ON THE INVESTMENTS WITH CO - OPERATIVE BANKS AND OTHER BANKS, THE CO - ORDINATE BENCH ORDER OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF KIZHATHADIYOOR SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED IN ITA NO.525/COCH/2014 (ORDER DATED 20.07.2016) , HAD HELD THAT INTEREST INCOME EARNED FROM INVESTMENTS WITH TREASURIES AND BANKS IS PART OF BANKING ACTIVITY OF THE ASSESSEE, AND THEREFORE, THE SAID INTEREST INCOME WAS ELIGIBLE TO BE ASSESSED AS `INCOME FROM BUSINESS INSTEAD OF `INCOME FROM OTHER SOURCES. H OWEVER, AS REGARDS THE GRANT OF DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT ON SUCH INTEREST INCOME, THE ASSESSING OFFICER SHALL FOLLOW THE LAW LAID DOWN BY THE LARGER BENCH OF THE HONBLE JURISDICTIONAL HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF THE MAVILAYI SERVICE CO - OPERATIVE BA NK LTD. V. CIT (SUPRA) AND EXAMINE THE ACTIVITIES OF THE ASSESSEE - SOCIETIES BEFORE GRANTING DEDUCTION U/S 80P OF THE I.T.ACT ON SUCH INTEREST INCOME. IT IS ORDERED ACCORDINGLY. 8 . IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL S FILED BY THE ASSESSEE ARE ALLOWED FOR STATISTICA L PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON THIS 13 TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2020 . SD/ - SD/ - ( CHANDRA POOJARI ) ( GEORGE GEORGE K. ) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER COCHIN ; DATED : 13 TH JANUARY, 2020 . DEV A DAS G * ITA NO. 625 - 626 / COCH /201 9. M/S. THE PARAKODE SERVICE CO - OP BANK LTD. 8 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : BY ORDER, (ASSTT. REGISTRAR) ITAT, COCHIN 1. THE APPELLANT. 2. THE RESPONDENT. 3. THE CIT (A) , KOTTAYAM. 4. THE PR.CIT , KOTTAYAM . 5. DR, ITAT, COCHIN 6. GUARD FILE.