V. K. INDUSTRIES, MUMBAI V. DCIT - 30(2), MUMBAI

ITA 6409/MUM/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 125 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5586 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 9 month(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 31-07-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 31-10-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL F BENCH, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI B.R. BASKARAN (AM) & SHRI PAWAN SINGH (JM) I.T.A. NO. 6409/MUM/2016 (ASSESSMENT YEAR 2008 - 09) V.K. INDUSTRIES M/S. N.M. ASSOCIATES, CAS. 1, TARLIKA, GROUND FLOOR 216, SIR BHALCHANDRA RO AD MATUNGA, MUMBAI - 400 019. PAN : AADFV1419P VS . DCIT 30(2) BUILDING C - 13 BKC MUMBAI - 400051. ( APPELLANT ) ( RESPONDENT ) C ORRIGENDUM THE ASSESSEE HAS MOVED THIS PETITION, WHEREIN IT IS SUBMITTED THAT THE APPEAL NUMBERED AS ITA NO.6409/MUM/2016 WAS RELATED TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 - 10, BUT THE ASSESSMENT YEAR HAS BEEN WRONGLY MENTIONED AS 2008 - 09 IN THE CAUSE TITLE OF THE ORDER DATED 17 - 05 - 2018 PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL. WE VERIFIED THE RECORD AND NOTICE THAT THE APPEAL ACTUALLY RELATED TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009 - 10 ONLY AND IT HAS BEEN WRONGLY MENTIONED AS 2008 - 09 IN THE CAUSE TITLE OF THE ORDER PASSED BY THE TRIBUNAL , EVEN THO UGH THE ASSESSMENT YEAR WAS CORRECTLY STATED AS 2009 - 10 IN THE BODY OF THE ORDER . ACCORDINGLY WE ISSUE THIS CORRIGENDUM AND STATE THAT THE ASSESSMENT YEAR SHOULD BE READ AS 2009 - 10 IN THE CAUSE TITLE IN THE PLACE OF 2008 - 09. ORDERED ACCORDING LY ON 31 ST JULY, 2018. SD/ - SD/ - (PAWAN SINGH ) (B.R.BASKARAN) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTA NT MEMBER MUMBAI ; DATED : 31 / 7 / 20 1 8 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. THE APPELLANT 2. THE RESPONDENT 3. THE CIT(A) 2 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. GUARD FILE. BY ORDER, //TRUE COPY// SENIOR P RIVATE S ECRETARY PS ITAT, MUMBAI