ACIT, Circle-8(1), New Delhi V. Eduwizards Infosolutions Pvt. Lt,d., New Delhi

ITA 6476/DEL/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 106 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 0262 (ITAT-DELHI)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 year(s) 3 month(s) 4 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-01-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Department
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: B
• Assessment Year: 2014-2015
• Appeal Filed On: 07-10-2018
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Keywords: Tax effect; Tax effect
• Section: 68

Judgement Text

IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH ‘B’, NEW DELHI BEFORE SH. ANIL CHATURVEDI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SH. CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) ITA No. 6476/Del/2018 (for Assessment Year : 2014-15) ACIT Circle – 8(1) New Delhi PAN No. AABCE 7367 C Vs. M/s. Eduwizards Infosolutions Pvt. Ltd., 4, Scindia House, Connaught Place New Delhi – 110 001 (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) Assessee by --None-- Revenue by Shi K. A. Manu, Sr. D.R. Date of hearing: 12.01.2022 Date of Pronouncement: 12.01.2022 ORDER PER ANIL CHATURVEDI, AM : This appeal filed by the Revenue is directed against the order dated 13.07.2018 passed by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Delhi relating to Assessment Year 2014-15. 2. Revenue has raised the following grounds of appeals: 1. “Ld. Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) erred on law and on the facts of the case in deleting the addition of Rs.65,06,815/- made by the AO on account of Undisclosed income u/s 68 of the I.T. Act, 1961. 2 2. The appellant craves leave to add, alter or amend any ground of appeal raised above at the time of hearing.” 3. On the date of hearing, none appeared on behalf of assessee though the case file reveals that on the last occasion, the hearing was adjourned at the request of the assessee. In such a situation, we proceed to dispose of the appeals ex parte qua the assessee and after hearing the Learned DR. 4. We have heard the rival submission and perused the material on record. On perusing the grounds of appeal raised by the Revenue, we find that Revenue is aggrieved by the order of Learned CIT(A) in respect of the relief given by him. We find that CBDT vide Circular No. 3/2018 dated 11.07.2018 had increased the limit for filing appeal before ITAT at Rs. 20 lakhs. The limit for filing the appeal before ITAT and other authorities were enhanced by CBDT vide Circular No.17 of 2019 dated 08.08.2019. As per the aforesaid CBDT Circular dated 08.08.2019, no Department appeal is to be filed against relief given by the Learned CIT(A) before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal unless the tax effect, excluding interest, exceeds Rs.50 lakhs. We find that in the present case, the tax effect involved is less than Rs.50 lakhs. In the absence of any material placed on record by the Revenue to demonstrate that the issue in the present appeal is covered by exceptions provided in para 10 of the aforesaid CBDT Circular of 11.07.2018, we are of the view that the monetary limit prescribed by the instructions of the CDBT Circular dated 08.08.2019 would 3 be applicable to the present appeal of the Department. We therefore hold the present appeal of Revenue to be not maintainable on account of low tax effect. However, in case there is any error in the computation of the tax effect involved or if for any reason, the aforesaid CBDT Circular is not applicable, it would be open to the Revenue to seek revival of the appeal. Thus the appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. 5. In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed. Order pronounced in the open court on 12.01.2022, immediately after conclusion of the hearing of the matter in virtual mode. Sd/- Sd/- (CHALLA NAGENDRA PRASAD) (ANIL CHATURVEDI) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Date:- 12.01.2022 PY* Copy forwarded to: 1. Appellant 2. Respondent 3. CIT 4. CIT(Appeals) 5. DR: ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR ITAT NEW DELHI