IN THE INCOME-TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI BENCH B, NEW DELHI BEFORE : SHRI BHAVNESH SAINI, JUDICIAL MEMBER AND SHRI L.P. SAHU, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO. 6480/DEL./2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2010-11 CANE DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL, ROHANKALAN, C/O DS KOHLI, ADVOCATE, F-06, 1 ST FLOOR, NARAYAN TOWER, GANDHI LANE, GOLGHAR, GORAKHPUR (UP) (PAN AAALC 0277F) (APPELLANT) VS. J.C.I.T., RANGE - 1, MUZAFFARNAGAR. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY NONE RESPONDENT BY SHRI RAGHUNATH, SR. DR ORDER PER L.P. SAHU, A.M.: THE ASSESSEE IS IN APPEAL BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL AGAI NST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A), MUZAFFARNAGAR DATED 01.08.2014 PASS ED FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2010-11. 2. NONE IS PRESENT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE DESPIT E THE NOTICE FOR HEARING WAS SENT THROUGH REGISTERED POST AT THE ADDRESS GIV EN IN THE APPEAL PAPERS. THERE IS NO WRITTEN REQUEST ON RECORD FOR ADJOURNME NT ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. IT, THEREFORE, APPEARS THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN DATE OF HEARING 22.11.2017 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 22.11.2017 ITA NO. 6480/DEL./2014 2 PROSECUTING THE APPEAL. THEREFORE, THE APPEAL OF TH E ASSESSEE DESERVES TO BE DISMISSED IN LIMINE FOR WANT OF PROSECUTION IN VIEW OF THE ORDERS OF T RIBUNAL IN CIT VS. MULTI PLAN INDIA (P) LTD., 38 ITD 320 (DEL. ) AND OF M.P. HIGH COURT IN ESTATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 48 0 (MP). 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED, AS INDIC ATED ABOVE. ORDER IS PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 22.11.2017 . SD/- SD/- (BHAVNESH SAINI) (L.P. SA HU) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER DATED: 22.11.2017 *AKS* COPY OF ORDER FORWARDED TO: (1) THE APPELLANT (2) THE RESPONDENT (3) COMMISSIONER (4) CIT(A) (5) DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE (6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER ASSISTANT REGISTRAR INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCHES, NEW DELHI