M/S RAM RATAN PRAJAPAT HUF, KISHANGARH V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KISHANGARH

ITA 650/JPR/2018

• Counselvise Citation: [2021] 109 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5119 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 8 month(s) 28 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 08-02-2021
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2010-2011
• Appeal Filed On: 11-05-2018
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: MONISHA CHOUDHARY ACIT A
• Assessee Lawyers: DEVANG GARGIEYA ITP
• Keywords: Competent authority

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S,B JAIPUR JH LAANHI XKSLKBZ] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI SANDEEP GOSAIN, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SING H YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA. NO. 648 TO 650/JP/2018 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2007-08 TO 2010-11 M/S RAM RATAN PRAJAPAT, HUF, VILLAGE-SANWATSAR, MADANGANJ, KISHANGARH. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-1, KISHANGARH.. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AARHR 1174 F VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI DEVANG GARGIEYA (ITP) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SMT. MONISHA CHOUDHARY (ACIT) A LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 05/02/2021 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 08/02/2021 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. THESE ARE THREE APPEALS FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAI NST THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A), AJMER ALL DATED 01.02.2018 FOR ASSESSME NT YEARS 2007-08 TO 2010-11 RESPECTIVELY. 2. THE LD A/R HAS STATED AT THE BAR THAT THE ASSES SEE HAS FILED A PETITION UNDER VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME-2020 TO SE TTLE THE AFORESAID MATTER AND THE SAID PETITION HAS RECENTLY BEEN ACCE PTED AND FORM 3 AS BEEN ISSUED BY THE COMPETENT AUTHORITY. IT WAS ACCO RDINGLY REQUESTED THAT THE ASSESSEE MAY BE ALLOWED TO WITHDRAW THE PR ESENT APPEALS. ITA NO. 648 TO 650/JP/2018 M/S RAM RATAN PRAJAPAT HUF VS. ITO 2 3. THE LD. DR IS HEARD WHO DID NOT RAISE ANY SPECI FIC OBJECTION IN ACCEPTING THE SAID PRAYER OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN VIEW OF ABOVE, THE PRAYER OF THE ASSESSEE IS ACCEPTED AND THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN BY THE ASSESSEE. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 08/02/2021. SD/- SD/- LANHI XKSLKBZ FOE FLAG ;KNO ( SANDEEP GOSAIN ) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 08/02/2021. *SANTOSH VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- M/S RAM RATAN PRAJAPAT, HUF, KISHANGARH. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD-1, KISHANGARH. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE { ITA NO. 648 TO 650/JP/2018} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR