IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL HYDERABAD B BENCH, HYDERABAD BEFORE SHRI H.S. SIDHU, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ITA NO.650/HYD/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 ITA NO.651/HYD/2011 ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08 THE ITO WARD 9(2), HYDERABAD VS DR. MUKESH RAJ, LAL DARWAZA, HYDERABAD. (PAN AAYPP9505 M) APPELLANT RESPONDENT APPELLANT BY : SHRI N.H. NAYAK RESPONDENT BY : SHRI M.S. DAYAKAR DATE OF HEARING : 28.11.2011 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 28.11.2011 ORDER PER BENCH: THESE TWO APPEALS PREFERRED BY THE REVENUE A RE DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE CIT(A) VI, HYDERAB AD DATED 31.12.2010 AND THEY PERTAIN TO THE ASSESSMENT YEARS 2006-07 & 2007- 08. SINCE ISSUES INVOLVED IN THESE TWO APPEALS ARE COMMON, THEY ARE CLUBBED, HEARD AND DISPOSED OFF TOGETHER FOR THE SA KE OF CONVENIENCE. 2. WE HAVE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND PERUSED TH E MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IT IS UNDISPUTED FACT THAT TH E TAX EFFECT IN THESE TWO APPEALS PREFERRED BY THE REVENUE IS LESS THAN R S.3 LAKHS. WE FIND THAT IN VIEW OF THE INSTRUCTIONS NO.3 OF 2011 (F.NO.279/MISC.142/2007/ITJ), DATED 9 TH FEBRUARY, 2011 ISSUED BY THE CBDT , THE PRESENT TWO APPEALS INVOLVING TAX EFFECT OF L ESS THAN ITA NOS.650 & 650/HYD/2011 DR.MUKESH RAJ, HYDERABAD RS.3 LAKHS ARE NOT MAINTAINABLE AND ACCORDINGLY BOT H THE APPEALS OF THE REVENUE ARE DISMISSED. 3. IN THE RESULT, BOTH THE APPEALS FILED BY THE REVENUE ARE DISMISSED IN LIMINE AS UN-ADMITTED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 28.11.2011 SD/- SD/- (CHANDRA POOJARI) ( H.S. SIDHU) A CCOUNTANT MEMBER JUDICIAL MEMBER DATED THE 28 TH NOVEMBER, 2011 COPY FORWARDED TO: 1. THE ITO WARD 9(2), HYDERABAD 2. DR. MUKESH RAJ, H.NO.23-5-260, INSIDE LALDARWAZA, H YDERABAD 3. THE CIT(A)-VI, HYDERABAD 4. THE CIT, HYDERABAD 5. THE DR, ITAT, HYDERABAD NP/