, .. , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL , SMC B BENCH, CHENNAI . , ! BEFORE SHRI A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER ./ I.T.A.NOS.664/MDS/2017 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2012-13) M/S. DAWOODI BOHRA JAMAAT TRUST, BURHANI MASJIT, BURHANI COLONY, PEELAMEDU, COIMBATORE 641 004. VS THE ACIT (EXEMPTIONS), COIMBATORE PAN: AABTD5410B ( /APPELLANT) ( /RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE /RESPONDENT BY : SHRI B. SAGADEVAN, JCIT /DATE OF HEARING : 03.10.2017 ! /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 03.10.2017 / O R D E R THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LD. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-2, COIMBATORE DATED 30.12.2016 IN ITA NO.149/15-16 FOR THE ASSESS MENT YEAR 2012- 13 PASSED U/S.250(6) R.W.S.143(3) OF THE ACT. 2. IN THIS APPEAL, NOTICE FOR HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE BY REGISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGEMENT CARD INTIMATIN G THE ASSESSEE THAT THE APPEAL IS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 03.10.2017. HOWEVER, ON 03.10.2017, NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE , NOR ANY REQUEST FOR ADJOURNMENT WAS FILED. MOREOVER ON THE EARLIER OCCASIONS 2 ITA NO.664/MDS/2017 ON 14.06.2017 & 07.08.2017 THE LD. AR HAD SOUGHT AD JOURNMENT AND THE SAME WAS GRANTED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, IM OF THE CONSIDERED OP INION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE APPEAL F ILED BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE DEL HI BENCH IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 I TD 320 AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT I N THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480), I DISMISS THE APPEAL IN LIMINE. THE REGISTRY IS HEREBY DIRECTED TO DISPATCH THIS OR DER TO THE ASSESSEE WITHIN A PERIOD OF 7 DAYS FROM THIS DAY. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 3 RD OCTOBER, 2017 AT CHENNAI. SD/- ( . ) (A. MOHAN ALANKAMONY) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER '# /CHENNAI, $% /DATED 03 RD OCTOBER, 2017 RSR % '( )( /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. , ( )/CIT(A) 4. , /CIT 5. (-. / /DR 6. .0 /GF