, , IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL A BENCH, CHENNAI , . ! ' , # '$ BEFORE SHRI CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI G. PAVAN KUMAR, JUDICIAL MEMBER . /ITA NOS. 67 & 68/MDS/2016 / ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2007-08 MOHANKRISHNAN, NO.35, NEW 28, ST. THOMAS NAGAR, LITTLE MOUNT, CHENNAI 600 015. PAN AGIPM0599G ( /APPELLANT) V. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, BUSINESS WARD-IV(2), CHENNAI. RESPONDENT) / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI P. RADHAKRISHNAN, JCIT ! / DATE OF HEARING : 09.06.2016 '# ! / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 06.07.2016 % / O R D E R PER CHANDRA POOJARI, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER THESE APPEALS BY THE ASSESSEE ARE DIRECTED AGAIN ST DIFFERENT ORDERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX( APPEALS), DATED 27.1.2014 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2007-08. - - ITA 67 & 68/16 2 2. NOTICE OF THE HEARING WAS SENT TO THE ASSESSEE T HROUGH REGISTERED POST WITH ACKNOWLEDGMENT DUE (RPAD) AT T HE ADDRESS GIVEN IN FORM NO. 36. A PERUSAL OF THE ACK NOWLEDGMENT CARD WHICH IS RECORD SHOWS THAT HE RPAD WAS DULY RE CEIVED BY THE ASSESSEE ON 04-05-2016. DESPITE SERVICE OF NOT ICE, NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY APPL ICATION FOR ADJOURNMENT HAS BEEN RECEIVED. 3. IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE, WE ARE OF THE CONSIDERED OPINION THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THE APPEAL BEFORE THIS TRIBUNAL. HENCE, FOLLOWING THE DECISIO N OF THE DELHI BENCH OF THE TRIBUNAL IN THE CASE OF CIT V. MULTIPLAN INDIA P. LTD., REPORTED IN 38 ITD 320 AND THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR (223 ITR 480) , WE DISMISS THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE FOR NON- PROSECUTION. - - ITA 67 & 68/16 3 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEALS OF THE ASSESSEE ARE DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED ON WEDNESDAY, THE 06 TH OF JULY, 2016 AT CHENNAI. SD/- SD/- ( $% & ) ( ' ( ) $ ) *%+,-,./01,2345,.62,+778,293 : ;< /JUDICIAL MEMBER ! ;<=>>70.?,.?@A1BA2 ': /CHENNAI, C; /DATED, THE 6 TH JULY, 2016. MPO* ;D EFGF /COPY TO: 1. /APPELLANT 2. /RESPONDENT 3. H3 /CIT(A) 4. H /CIT 5. FIJ K /DR 6. JLM /GF.