VALIA CHEMICALS P.LTD, NAVI MUMBAI V. ITO 2(3)(4), MUMBAI

ITA 676/MUM/2012

• Counselvise Citation: [2013] 120 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 3827 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 1 year(s) 2 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 10-04-2013
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: F
• Next Hearing Date: 10-04-2013
• Assessment Year: 2006-2007
• Appeal Filed On: 02-02-2012
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: OM PRAKASH MEENA

Judgement Text

, IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCHES F MUMBAI . . , / BEFORE SHRI I.P. BANSAL, JUDICIAL MEMBER /AND , SHRI RAJENDRA, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER . / ITA NO.676/MUM/2012 ! ! ! ! ' ' ' ' / ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006-07 VALIA CHEMICALS PVT. LTD. VALIA HOUSE, D-16/1, TTC INDUSTRIAL AREA, MIDC, TURBHE, NAVI MUMBAI 400 705. ! ! ! ! / VS. THE ITO 2(3)(4), MUMBAI. # ./ $ ./ PAN/GIR NO. : AAACV 1474A ( #% / APPELLANT ) .. ( &'#% / RESPONDENT ) #% ( / APPELLANT BY: NONE &'#% ) ( / RESPONDENT BY : SHRI OM PRAKASH MEENA ! ) * / DATE OF HEARING : 10/04/2013 +,' ) * / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 10/04/2013 - / O R D E R PER I.P.BANSAL, J.M: THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE. IT IS D IRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY LD. CIT(A)-6, MUMBAI DATED 19/01/2011 FOR ASSESSMENT YEAR 2006- 07. 2. FIRSTLY, THIS APPEAL WAS FIXED FOR HEARING ON 31 /1/2013 WHEN NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE AND THE APPEAL W AS ADJOURNED TO 10/04/2013 WITH A DIRECTION TO ISSUE NOTICE THROUGH RPAD. ACCORDIN GLY, THE NOTICE WAS SENT AND THE . / ITA NO.676/MUM/2012 2 SAME HAS DULY BEEN ACKNOWLEDGED BY THE ASSESSEE ON 16/2/2013. HOWEVER, ON 10/4/2013 AGAIN NONE APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSE SSEE DESPITE SERVICE OF NOTICE. IT IS THEREFORE, PRESUMED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PROSECUTING THIS APPEAL AND FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF THE TRIBUNA L REPORTED IN THE CASE OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD.38 ITD 320 (DEL) A ND THE DECISION OF THE HONBLE MADHYA PRADESH HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ES TATE OF LATE TUKOJIRAO HOLKAR VS. CWT, 223 ITR 480 (M.P) THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. . */ ! .* ) 0 . ) * 12 3 ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 10/04/2013 - ) +,' 0 4!/ 10/04/2013 , ) 5 3 SD/- SD/- ( / RAJENDRA ) ( . . / I.P. BANSAL ) / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER / JUDICIAL MEMBER MUMBAI; 4! DATED 10/04/2013 - - - - ) )) ) &*78 &*78 &*78 &*78 98'* 98'* 98'* 98'* / COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO : 1. #% / THE APPELLANT 2. &'#% / THE RESPONDENT. 3. : ( ) / THE CIT(A)- 4. : / CIT 5. 8;5 &*! , , / DR, ITAT, MUMBAI 6. 5< = / GUARD FILE. -! -! -! -! / BY ORDER, '8* &* //TRUE COPY// > >> > / 1 1 1 1 (DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR) , / ITAT, MUMBAI . ! . ./ VM , SR. PS