IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL DELHI BENCH C : NEW DELHI (THROUGH VIDEO CONFERENCING) BEFORE SHRI G.S. PANNU, VICE PRESIDENT AND SHRI K. NARASIMHA CHARY , JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 6996/DEL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2014-15 AKHIL KUMAR JAIN, GHANTA GHAR, SAMBHAL, UTTAR PRADESH - 244302 (PAN: AEZPJ2035B) VS. ITO, SAMBHAL (APPELLANT) (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SH. PRAMOD KR. AGGARWAL, ADV. RESPONDENT BY : SH. M. BARANWAL, SR. DR. DATE OF HEARING : 10.02.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 10.02.2021 ORDER PER G.S. PANNU, VP : THIS APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15 IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER OF LEARNED CIT(A), MORAD ABAD. 2. THE ASSESSEE VIDE HIS LETTER DATED 27.1.2020, HAS INTIMAT ED THE TRIBUNAL THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED TO SETTLE THE D ISPUTE RELATING TO THE TAX ARREARS FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR UNDER CONSIDERA TION UNDER THE VIVAD SE 2 VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (IN SHORT THE ACT) AND REQUESTED FOR WITHDRAWAL OF THE SAID APPEAL. 3. CONSIDERING THE AFORESAID SITUATION, THE CAPTIONED APPEAL IS CONSIGNED TO RECORDS AND TREATED AS DISMISSED. 4. HOWEVER, THE AFORESAID IS SUBJECT TO A CAVEAT THA T IN CASE THE DISPUTE RELATING TO TAX ARREARS FOR THE CAPTIONED A SSESSMENT YEAR IS NOT ULTIMATELY RESOLVED IN TERMS OF THE AFORESAID ACT, THE APPELLANT (I.E., THE ASSESSEE) SHALL BE AT LIBERTY TO APPROACH THE TRIBUN AL FOR REINSTITUTION OF THE APPEAL AND THE TRIBUNAL SHALL CONSIDER SUCH APPLICAT ION APPROPRIATELY AS PER LAW. THE RESPONDENT (I.E., THE REVENUE) HAS NO OB JECTION WITH REGARD TO THE AFORESAID CAVEAT. 5. IN VIEW OF THE AFORESAID, THE APPEAL IS CONSIGNE D TO RECORD AND, FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, IS TREATED AS DISMISSED. ABOVE DECISION WAS ANNOUNCED IN THE PRESENCE OF BOT H THE PARTIES ON CONCLUSION OF VIRTUAL HEARING ON 10 FEBRUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- ( K. NARASIMHA CHARY ) (G.S. PANNU) JUDICIAL MEMBER VICE PRESIDENT SRB COPY FORWARDED TO: - 1. APPELLANT . 2. RESPONDENT. 3. CIT 4. CIT(A) 5. DR, ITAT ASSISTANT REGISTRAR