ABDUL SAMI, Jaipur V. ITO, Jaipur

ITA 709/JPR/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2016] 131 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4983 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 3 month(s) 7 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 20-10-2016
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: Not Allotted
• Assessment Year: 2008-2009
• Appeal Filed On: 13-07-2016
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: R A VERMA CIT DHK
• Assessee Lawyers: SHRAVAN GUPTA

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES (SMC), JAIPUR JH HKKXPAN] YS[KK LNL; ] DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 709/JP/2016 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2008-09 ABDUL SAMI, H.NO. 1842, NAHERON KI NADI CHOKDI RAMCHANDRA JI KI, RAMGANJ BAZAR, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 7(3), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: ANPPS 5802 A VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY : SHRI SHRAVAN GUPTA (ADV.) JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY : SHRI R.A. VERMA (ADDL. CIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 19/10/2016 MN?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K @ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 20/10/2016 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: BHAGCHAND, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST THE ORDER DATED 29/04/2016 PASSED BY THE LD CIT(A)-3, JAIPUR FOR TH E A.Y. 2008-09. 2. AT THE OUTSET, THE LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE HAS SU BMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED APPEAL ON 15/6/2016 AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), WHICH HAS BEEN NUMBERED AS ITA NO. 663/JP/2016 AND D UE TO INADVERTENT MISTAKE, THE APPEAL WAS AGAIN FILED ON 13/7/2016, WHI CH WAS NUMBER AS ITA 709/JP/2016_ ABDUL SAMI VS ITO 2 ITA NO. 719/JP/2016. THUS, THE APPEAL HAS BEEN FILED TWICE AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) AND HE PRAYED THAT THIS APPE AL I.E. ITA NO. 709/JP/2016 MAY BE TREATED AS WITHDRAWN. 3. AFTER HEARING THE REVENUE, THE ASSESSEE WAS ALLOWE D TO WITHDRAW HIS APPEAL. HENCE, THE PRESENT APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS WI THDRAWN. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 20/10/2016. SD/- HKKXPAN (BHAGCHAND) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 20 TH OCTOBER, 2016 *RANJAN VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR @ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ @ THE APPELLANT- SHRI ABDUL SAMI, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ @ THE RESPONDENT- THE ITO, WARD 7(3), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR @ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY @ THE CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ @ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY @ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 709/JP/2016) VKNS'KKUQLKJ @ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASST. REGISTRAR