आयकरअपीलीयअधिकरण , अहमदाबादनयायपीी INTHEINCOMETAXAPPELLATETRIBUNAL, ‘’C’’BENCH,AHMEDABAD BEFOREMsSUCHITRAKAMBLE,JUDICIALMEMBER And SHRIWASEEMAHMED,ACCOUNTANTMEMBER आयकरअपीलसं./ITANo.713/AHD/2023 धििाधरणवरध / Asstt.Year:2012-2013 HajiaminuddinHajihisamuddin Shaikh, F-201ShyamwalaComplex, Opp.BhadraKacheriPanigate, Vadodara-390017. PAN:APKPS9618H Vs. IncomeTaxOfficer, Ward-(3)(1)(1), Vadodara. (Applicant)(Respondent) Assesseeby:ShriJigarAdhyaru,AR Revenueby:ShriAshokKumarSuthar,Sr.DR सुिवाईकीतारीख /DateofHearing:28/02/2024 घोरणाकीतारीख/DateofPronouncement:06/03/2024 आदेश/ORDER PERWASEEMAHMED,ACCOUNTANTMEMBER: ThecaptionedappealhasbeenfiledattheinstanceoftheAssesseeagainst theorderoftheLearnedCommissionerofIncomeTax(Appeals),Vadodara, arisinginthematterofassessmentorderpassedunders.143r.w.s.147ofthe IncomeTaxAct,1961(here-in-afterreferredtoas"theAct")relevanttothe AssessmentYear2012-13. 2.Inthepresentcase,theLd.CIT(A),haspassedex-parteordertothe assesseeafterconfirmingtheadditionmadebytheAO.TheLd.CIT(A),has ITAno.713/AHD/2023 A.Y.2012-13 2 issuedtwonoticesdated22/01/2021and06/10/2021andthereafterasystem generatedcommunicationdated07/11/2022,wasnotifiedtotheassessee,but therewasnoresponse.Thus,theLd.CIT(A),intheabsenceofanyco-operation fromthesideoftheassesseeconfirmedtheorderoftheAO.Theimpugnedtwo noticeswereissuedbytheLd.CIT(A)duringthecovidperiodandthereforeinthe interestofjusticeandfairplayweset-asidetheissuetothefileoftheLd.CIT(A) forfreshadjudicationaspertheprovisionsoflaw.Hence,thegroundofappeal filedbytheassesseeisallowedforthestatisticalpurposes. 3.Intheresult,theappealfiledbytheassesseeisallowedforthestatistical purposes. OrderpronouncedintheCourton06/03/2024atAhmedabad. Sd/-Sd/- (SUCHITRAKAMBLE)(WASEEMAHMED) JUDICIALMEMBERACCOUNTANTMEMBER (TrueCopy) Ahmedabad;Dated06/03/2024 Manish