TATA STEEL LTD., MUMBAI V. PR CIT (2), MUMBAI

ITA 724/MUM/2020

• Counselvise Citation: [2022] 105 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 4680 (ITAT-MUMBAI)
• Duration Of Justice: 2 year(s) 2 month(s) 14 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 11-04-2022
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: E
• Assessment Year: 2009-2010
• Appeal Filed On: 28-01-2020
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: AMOL KIRTANE

Judgement Text

THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL “E” Bench, Mumbai Shri Shamim Yahya (AM) & Shri Kavitha Rajgopal (JM) I.T.A. No. 724/Mum/2020 (A.Y. 2009-10) Tata Steel Limited Bombay House 24, Homi Mody Street Fort, Mumbai- 400 001. PAN : AAACT2803M Vs. PCIT-2 Aayakar Bhavan 5 th Floor Room No. 344 M.K. Road Mumbai-400 020. (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee by Ms. Jasmin Amalsadvala Department by Shri Amol Kirtane Date of Hearing 17.02.2022 Date of Pronouncement 12.04.2022 O R D E R This appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of learned PCIT dated 31.12.2019 pertains to A.Y. 2009-10. 2. The grounds of appeal read as under : “The learned Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (ld PCIT) erred in revising purportedly under section 263, the assessment order under section 143(3) r.w.s. 144C(13) of the I.T. Act, 1961 of the learned Assessing Officer.” 3. At the outset in this case learned Counsel of the assessee submitted that the assessee seeks to withdraw the appeal. Learned Departmental Representative did not have any objection to this proposition. 4. In the result this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. Order pronounced in the open court on 12.04.2022. Sd/- Sd/- (KAVITHA RAJGOPAL) (SHAMIM YAHYA) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER Mumbai; Dated : 12/04/2022 Tata Steel Limited 2 Copy of the Order forwarded to : 1. The Appellant 2. The Respondent 3. The CIT(A) 4. CIT 5. DR, ITAT, Mumbai 6. Guard File. BY ORDER, //True Copy// (Assistant Registrar) PS ITAT, Mumbai