SANJEEV BROTHERS, JAIPUR V. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3-5, JAIPUR

ITA 731/JPR/2017

• Counselvise Citation: [2018] 121 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 9812 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 11 month(s) 27 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 26-09-2018
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Dismissed
• Bench Allotted: A
• Assessment Year: 2012-2013
• Appeal Filed On: 29-09-2017
• Result in Favour of: Revenue
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: J C KULHARI

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHE S, JAIPUR JH FOT; IKY JKO] U;KF;D LNL; ,OA JH FOE FLAG ;KNO] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI VIJAY PAL RAO, JM & SHRI VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, AM VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA. NO. 731/JP/2017 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEARS : 2012-13 SANJEEV BROTHERS C-10 VAISHALI NAGAR, JAIPUR. CUKE VS. THE ITO, WARD-3(5), JAIPUR. LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO.: AASFS 6387 A VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ L S@ ASSESSEE BY : NONE JKTLO DH VKSJ LS @ REVENUE BY : SHRI J.C. KULHARI (JCIT) LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF HEARING : 26/09/2018 MN?KKS'K.KK DH RKJH[ K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 26/09/2018 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER: VIKRAM SINGH YADAV, A.M. THIS IS AN APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE AGAINST TH E ORDER OF LD. CIT(A)-I, JAIPUR DATED 21.07.2017 FOR THE ASSESSMEN T YEAR 2012-13. 2. NONE HAS APPEARED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE NOR ANY ADJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS FILED. IN THE PAST ALS O, THE MATTER WAS ADJOURNED IN NUMBER OF OCCASIONS. IT IS THUS APPAR ENT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS NOT INTERESTED IN PURSUING THE PRESENT APPEAL. SO IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES, FOLLOWING THE DECISION OF DELHI BENC H OF ITAT IN THE CASE ITA NO. 731/JP/2017 SANJEEV BROTHERS VS. ITO 2 OF CIT VS. MULTIPLAN INDIA (P) LTD., [1991] 38 ITD 320 AND ALSO ON THE JUDGMENT OF THE HON'BLE M.P. HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF ESTATE OF LATE TUKHOJI RAO HOLKAR VS. CWT [1997] 223 ITR 480, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED IN LIMINE. 3. BEFORE PARTING, IT IS APPROPRIATE TO STATE THAT IN CASE THE ASSESSEE IS SERIOUS IN PURSUING ITS APPEAL FILED, THEN IT WO ULD BE AT LIBERTY IF SO ADVISED TO PRAY FOR A RECALL OF THIS ORDER BY MOVIN G AN APPROPRIATE APPLICATION AND BY GIVING AN UNDERTAKING THAT IT SH ALL NOT ABUSE THE TIME OF THE TRIBUNAL. IN THE RESULT, APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DISMISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 26/09/2018. SD/- SD/- FOT; IKY JKO FOE FLAG ;KNO (VIJAY PAL RAO) (VIKRAM SINGH YADAV) U;KF;D LNL;@ JUDICIAL MEMBER YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 26/09/2018. *SANTOSH VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSFKR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- SANJEEV BROTHERS, JAIPUR. 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- ITO, WARD- 3(5), JAIPUR. 3. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT(A) 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR. 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE { ITA NO. 731/JP/2017} VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ@ ASST. REGISTRAR