IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL B, BENC H KOLKATA BEFORE SHRI S.S.GODARA, JM &DR. A.L.SAINI, AM ./ITA NO.731/KOL/2019 ( / ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2014-15) BASUKI VYAPAAR PVT. LTD. 8/1B, CHOWRINGHEE LANE, KOLKATA-700016. VS. ITO, WARD-12(2), KOLKATA ./ ./PAN/GIR NO.: AACCB 6156 B (APPELLANT) .. (RESPONDENT) APPELLANT BY : SHRI MIHIR BANDOPADHYAY, A.R. RESPONDENT BY : SMT. RANU BISWAS, ADDL. CIT / DATE OF HEARING : 31/10/2019 /DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 13/11/2019 / O R D E R PER BENCH: THE CAPTIONED APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE , PE RTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15, IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED BY TH E COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEAL)-4, KOLKATA, WHICH IN TURN ARISES OUT OF AN ASSESSMENT ORDER PASSED BY THE ASSESSING OFFICER U/S 143(3) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT , 1961 (IN SHORT THE ACT) DATED 26/12/2016. 2. AT THE OUTSET ITSELF, THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE AS SESSEE SUBMITTED THAT THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT REPRESENT HIS CASE BEFORE LD. CIT(A) AS T HE NOTICE WAS NOT SERVED TO THE ASSESSEE DURING THE APPELLATE PROCEEDINGS AND THE O RDER BEING AN EX-PARTE ORDER, STOOD VITIATED ON ACCOUNT OF VIOLATION OF PRINCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE. THE LD. COUNSEL FOR THE ASSESSEE CONTENDED THAT IN THE INTE REST OF JUSTICE, ANOTHER BASUKI VYAPAAR PVT. LTD. ITA NO.731/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2014-15 P PP PA AA AG GG GE EE E | || | 2 22 2 OPPORTUNITY TO CONTEST THE APPEAL BEFORE THE LD. FI RST APPELLATE AUTHORITY MAY BE GRANTED TO THE ASSESSEE. 3. WE HEARD BOTH THE PARTIES AND CAREFULLY GONE THR OUGH THE SUBMISSION PUT FORTH ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE ALONG WITH THE DOCUMENTS FURNISHED AND THE CASE LAWS RELIED UPON, AND PERUSED THE FACT OF THE CASE INCLU DING THE FINDINGS OF THE LD CIT(A) AND OTHER MATERIAL AVAILABLE ON RECORD. WE N OTE THAT THE LD. CIT(A) DID NOT CONSIDER THE ASSESSMENT RECORDS WHILE ADJUDICATING THE ISSUE. WE NOTE THAT THE LD. CIT(A) DID NOT DISCUSS THE ASSESSEES CASE ON MERIT S BASED ON THE MATERIAL AVAILABLE BEFORE HIM HENCE IT IS A VIOLATION OF PRI NCIPLE OF NATURAL JUSTICE. WE NOTE THAT ASSESSEE HAS PARTICIPATED IN APPELLATE PROCEED INGS, VIDE PARA 2 OF THE ORDER OF LD. CIT(A), WHEREIN LD. CIT(A) STATED THAT ASSESSEE SOUGHT ADJOURNMENT ON 26.09.2018, THEREAFTER LD. CIT(A) ISSUED NOTICE ON ASSESSEE ON THREE OCCASIONS, WHICH WERE NOT SERVED ON ASSESSEE DUE TO POSTAL ANO MALIES. WE NOTE THAT IT IS SETTLED LAW THAT PRINCIPLES OF NATURAL JUSTICE AND FAIR PLAY REQUIRE THAT THE EFFECTED PARTY IS GRANTED SUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HE ARD TO CONTEST HIS CASE. THEREFORE, WITHOUT DELVING MUCH DEEPER INTO THE MER ITS OF THE CASE, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE, WE RESTORE THE MATTER BACK TO THE FILE OF LD. CIT(A) FOR DE NOVO ADJUDICATION AND PASS A SPEAKING ORDER AFTER AFFORD ING SUFFICIENT OPPORTUNITY OF BEING HEARD TO THE ASSESSEE, WHO IN TURN, IS ALSO D IRECTED TO CONTEST HIS STAND FORTHWITH. THEREFORE, WE DEEM IT FIT AND PROPER TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) AND REMIT THE MATTER BACK TO THE FILE OF THE LD. CIT(A) TO ADJUDICATE THE ISSUE AFRESH ON MERITS. FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES, T HE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS ALL OWED FOR STATISTICAL PURPOSES. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE COURT ON 13.11. 2019 SD/- ( S.S.GODARA ) SD/- (A.L.SAINI) / JUDICIAL MEMBER / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER /KOLKATA; / DATE: 13/11/2019 ( SB, SR.PS ) BASUKI VYAPAAR PVT. LTD. ITA NO.731/KOL/2019 ASSESSMENT YEAR:2014-15 P PP PA AA AG GG GE EE E | || | 3 33 3 COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. BASUKI VYAPAAR PVT. LTD. 2. ITO, WARD-12(2), KOLKATA 3. C.I.T(A)- 4. C.I.T.- KOLKATA. 5. CIT(DR), KOLKATA BENCHES, KOLKATA. 6. GUARD FILE. TRUE COPY BY ORDER ASSIST ANT REGISTRAR ITAT, KOLKA TA BENCHES