IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL MUMBAI BENCH D, MUMBAI BEFORE SHRI RAJESH KUMAR, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AND SHRI AMARJIT SINGH, JUDICIAL MEMBER ITA NO. 733/MUM/2020 (ASSESSMENT YEAR: 2014-15) MERCURY WINERY PRIVATE LIMITED CRYSTAL TOWER, JAMNA NIWAS COMPOUND, KASTURBA CROSS ROAD, KANDIVALI (W), MUMBAI-400 067 VS. DY. CIT, CIRCLE-12(3)(2), MUMBAI PAN/GIR NO. AAECM 7238 D ( APPELLANT ) : ( RESPONDENT ) APPELLANT BY : NONE RESPONDENT BY : ASHIMA GUPTA DATE OF HEARING : 14.01.2021 DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 14.01.2021 O R D E R PER RAJESH KUMAR, AM : THIS APPEAL BY ASSESSEE IS DIRECTED AGAINST THE ORD ER OF LEARNED COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS)-21, MUMBAI (IN SHORT THE C IT(A)) PERTAINING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2014-15. 2. AT THE OUTSET, IT WAS SUBMITTED BY THE LEARNED R EPRESENTATIVE OF THE ASSESSEE THAT THE ASSESSEE HAS OPTED FOR SOLUTION OF DISPUTE UNDE R THE VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME. 3. WE NOTE THAT IN A SIMILAR SITUATION, HON'BLE MAD RAS HIGH COURT HAS IN AN APPEAL IN THE CASE OF M/S. NANNUSAMY MOHAN (HUF) VS ACIT V IDE ORDER DATED 16.10.2020 HELD AS UNDER :- 3. THE LEARNED COUNSEL FOR THE APPELLANT / ASSESSE E, ON INSTRUCTIONS, SUBMITTED THAT THE APPELLANT / ASSESSEE INTENDS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME (VVS SCHEME FOR BREVITY) AND IN THIS REGARD, THE ASSESSEE IS TAKING STEPS TO FILE THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN FORM NO. I. 4. IT MAY NOT BE NECESSARY FOR THIS COURT TO DECIDE THE SUBSTANTIAL QUESTIONS OF LAW FRAMED FOR CONSIDERATION ON ACCOUNT OF CERTAIN SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS. THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA ENACTED THE DIRECT TAX VIVAD SE VISHWAS ACT, 2020 (ACT 3 OF 2 ITA NO. 733/MUM/2020 MERCURY WINERY PRIVATE LIMITED 2020) TO PROVIDE FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTED TAX AND FOR MATTERS CONNECTED THEREWITH OR INCIDENTAL THERETO. THE ACT OF THE PARLIAMENT RE CEIVED THE ASSENT OF THE PRESIDENT ON 17 TH MARCH 2020 AND PUBLISHED IN THE GAZETTE OF INDIA O N 17 TH MARCH 2020. 5. IN TERMS OF THE SAID ACT, THE ASSESSEE HAS BEEN GIVEN AN OPTION TO PUT AN END TO THE TAX DISPUTES, WHICH MAY BE PENDING AT DIFFERENT LEVELS EITHER BEFORE THE FIRST APPELLATE AUTHORITY OR BEFORE THE TRIBUNAL OR BEFOR E THE HIGH COURT OR BEFORE THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA. UNDER SECTION 2(J) DISPUTED TAX HAS BEEN DEFINED. IN TERMS OF SECTION 3, WHERE A DECLARANT M EANS A PERSON, WHO FILES A DECLARATION UNDER SECTION 4 ON OR BEFORE THE LAST D ATE FILES A DECLARATION TO THE DESIGNATED AUTHORITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISI ONS OF SECTION 4 IN RESPECT OF TAX ARREARS, THEN, NOTWITHSTANDING ANYTHING CONTAINED I N THE INCOME TAX ACT OR ANY OTHER LAW FOR THE TIME BEING IN FORCE, THE AMOUNT P AYABLE BY THE DECLARANT SHALL BE DETERMINED IN TERMS OF SECTION 3(A-C) THEREUNDER. 6. THE FIRST PROVISO TO SECTION 3 STATES THAT IN CA SE, WHERE AN APPEAL OR WRIT PETITION OR SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION IS FILED BY THE INCOME TAX AUTHORITY ON ANY ISSUE BEFORE THE APPELLATE FORUM, THE AMOUNT PAYABLE SHAL L BE ONE-HALF OF THE AMOUNT IN THE TABLE STIPULATED IN SECTION 3 CALCULATED ON SUC H ISSUE, IN SUCH A MANNER AS MAY BE PRESCRIBED. THE SECOND PROVISO DEALS WITH THE CA SES, WHERE THE MATTER IS BEFORE THE COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) OR BEFORE THE DISPUTE RE SOLUTION PANEL. THE THIRD PROVISO DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ISSUE IS PENDIN G BEFORE THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL. THE FILING OF THE DECLARATION I S AS PER SECTION 4 OF THE ACT AND THE PARTICULARS TO BE FURNISHED ARE ALSO MENTIONED IN THE SUB SECTIONS OF SECTION 4. SECTION 5 OF THE ACT DEALS WITH THE TIME AND MANNER OF THE PAYMENT AND SECTION 6 DEALS WITH IMMUNITY FROM INITIATION OF PROCEEDINGS IN RESPECT OF OFFENCE AND IMPOSITION OF PENALTY IN CERTAIN CASES. SECTION 9 O F THE ACT DEALS WITH CASES, WHERE THE ACT 3 OF 2020 WILL NOT BE APPLICABLE. 7. AS OBSERVED, THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY TO RE STORE THIS APPEAL IN THE EVENT THE ULTIMATE DECISION TO BE TAKEN ON THE DECLARATION TO BE FILED BY THE ASSESSEE UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE SAID ACT IS NOT IN FAVOUR OF THE A SSESSEE. IF SUCH A PRAYER IS MADE, THE REGISTRY SHALL ENTERTAIN THE PRAYER WITHOUT INS ISTING UPON ANY APPLICATION TO BE FILED FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY IN RESTORATION OF TH E APPEAL AND ON SUCH REQUEST MADE BY THE ASSESSEE BY FILING A MISCELLANEOUS PETITION FOR RESTORATION, THE REGISTRY SHALL PLACE SUCH PETITION BEFORE THE DIVISION BENCH FOR O RDERS. 8. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE, WE DIRECT THE APPELLA NT / ASSESSEE TO FILE THE FORM NO.I ON OR BEFORE 20.11.2020 AND THE COMPETENT AUTH ORITY SHALL PROCESS THE APPLICATION / DECLARATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE AC T AND PASS APPROPRIATE ORDERS AS EXPEDITIOUSLY AS POSSIBLE PREFERABLY WITHIN A PERIO D OF SIX (6) WEEKS FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THE DECLARATION IS FILED IN THE PROPER FORM. ACCORDINGLY, RESPECTFULLY FOLLOWING THE ABOVE AND N OTING THE FACT THAT THE ASSESSEE IS OPTING FOR RESOLUTION OF DISPUTE UNDER VIVAD SE VIS HWAS SCHEME IN THE PRESENT APPEAL, WE TREAT THE APPEAL AS DISPOSED OFF AS WIT HDRAWN. 3 ITA NO. 733/MUM/2020 MERCURY WINERY PRIVATE LIMITED 4. THE ASSESSEE IS GIVEN LIBERTY FOR RESTORATION OF APPEAL IN ACCORDANCE WITH PARAGRAPH 7 OF THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT ORDER AS ABOV E. THE LD. DR FAIRLY AGREED TO THE ABOVE PROPOSITION. 5. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL BY THE ASSESSEE IS DIS POSED OF BY TREATING THE SAME AS WITHDRAWN. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 14 TH JANUARY, 2021. SD/- SD/- (AMARJIT SINGH) JUDICIAL MEMBER (RAJESH KUMAR) ACCOUNTANT MEMBER MUMBAI, DATE : 14 TH JANUARY, 2021 ROSHANI, SR. PS COPY TO : 1) THE APPELLANT 2) THE RESPONDENT 3) THE CIT(A) CONCERNED 4) THE CIT CONCERNED 5) THE D.R, SMC BENCH, MUMBAI 6) GUARD FILE BY ORDER DY./ASSTT. REGISTRAR I.T.A.T, MUMBAI