] ]] ] IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL PUNE BENCH B, PUNE , !', $ % BEFORE MS. SUSHMA CHOWLA, JM AND SHRI PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM ITA NO.744/PN/2014 ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2009-10 ADINATH GANPAT CHAVAN, SHOP NO.1, NEAR DHAYARI, POST OFFICE SINHAGAD ROAD, PUNE 411 041. PAN : AFOPC6112L . APPELLANT VS. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-I, PUNE. . RESPONDENT / APPELLANT BY : NONE / RESPONDENT BY : SMT. DIVYA BAJPAI / DATE OF HEARING : 08.12.2015 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT: 08.12.2015 & / ORDER PER PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA, AM : THE PRESENT APPEAL PREFERRED BY THE ASSESSEE IS AGA INST THE ORDER OF CIT-I, PUNE DATED 21.03.2014 RELATING TO ASSESSMENT YEAR 2009-10 PASSED UNDER SECTION 264 OF THE INCOME-TAX ACT, 1961 (IN S HORT THE ACT). 2. BEFORE US, NONE APPEARED FOR THE ASSESSEE. NO A DJOURNMENT APPLICATION WAS MOVED EITHER. IT IS SEEN FROM THE RECORDS THAT THE NOTICES FOR HEARING HAVE BEEN SERVED ON THE ASSESSEE. THUS, IT CAN BE INFER RED THAT THE ASSESSEE IS INDOLENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPOINTED DATE OF H EARING. HENCE, WE PROCEED TO DECIDE THE PRESENT APPEAL AFTER HEARING THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE. 2 ITA NO.744/PN/2014 3. AT THE TIME OF HEARING, THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REP RESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE POINTED OUT THAT THE PRESENT APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER PASSED UNDER SECTION 264 OF THE ACT IS NOT MAINTAINABLE. HENCE, THE PRESENT APPEAL IS DISMISSED AS NOT MAINTAINABLE. 4. IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS DIS MISSED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON THIS 08 TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2015. SD/- SD/- ( SUSHMA CHOWLA ) ( PRADIP KUMAR KEDIA ) / JUDICIAL MEMBER $ / ACCOUNTANT MEMBER PUNE ; DATED : 08 TH DECEMBER, 2015. & ' ()* +*( / COPY OF THE ORDER IS FORWARDED TO : 1) THE ASSESSEE; 2) THE DEPARTMENT; 3) THE CIT-I, PUNE; 4) THE DR B BENCH, I.T.A.T., PUNE; 5) GUARD FILE. &, / BY ORDER , ' # //TRUE COPY// $ %& # '( / SR. PRIVATE SECRETARY ) '* , / ITAT, PUNE