, C IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL C BENCH, AHMEDABAD ( CONVENED T HROUGH VIRTUAL COURT ) BEFORE SHRI MAHAVIR PRASAD, JUDICIAL MEMBER & SHRI WASEEM AHMED , ACCOUNTANT MEMB E R S.NO APPEAL A.Y. APPELLANT (PAN NO.) RESPONDENT A.R. 1 ITA NO.775 /A HD / 20 1 8 2013 - 1 4 S HRI ALPESHKUMAR P. PATEL ( ACSPP9592J ) ITO , WARD - 3 ( 3 ) (1 ) , AHMEDA BAD SHRI S.N . SOPARKAR 2 ITA NO.2863/AHD/2017 2014 - 15 AANAN ATISHBHAI DALAL HUF ( AAJHA9161R) ITO, WARD - 3(3) (8), AHMEDABAD SHRI S.N. DIVATIA 3 ITA NO.2458 / A HD/ 2 018 2015 - 16 SARAF DYECHEM INDUSTRIES (ABSFS1166Q ) ACIT,CIRLE - 3(3 ), AHMEDA BAD WITHDRAWAL 4 IT A NO. 2060 /A HD / 20 1 6 2011 - 1 2 SHRI GHANSHYAMBHAI M. PATEL (BEGPP6249M ) DCIT, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) , VADODARA SHRI BHAVIN MARFATIA 5 ITA NO.873 /A HD /2 016 2012 - 13 PARTHIV MANHARBHAI SHAH (AMEPS1343Q ) IT O, WARD - 4 ( 2 ) (4 ), A HMEDABAD SHRI A.C. SHAH 6 ITA NO .1434 /A HD /2 019 201 1 - 1 2 SHETAL DEVANG GOR (ACIPP6190Q ) ACIT, (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION) - 2 , AHMED ABAD WITHDRAWAL 7 ITA NO. 2 62 /A HD /2 019 2015 - 16 AMITKUMAR J. BAROT (AGUPB5252F ) ACIT - CIRCLE - 3(3 ) , A HMEDA BAD SHRI BHAVESH SHAH 8 ITA NO.1421 /A HD /2 019 20 14 - 15 ATUL JASHWANTLAL SHAH, (ACIPS7564F ) ACIT - CIRCLE 5 ( 2 ), AHMEDABAD WITHDRAWAL REVENUE BY : SHRI S.S. SHUKLA , SR. D.R. / DATE OF HEARING 04 / 1 2 /20 20 / DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT 11 / 1 2 /20 20 I T A NO.775 /AHD/ 1 8 & 7 ORS. - 2 - / O R D E R PER BENCH : THE CAPTIONED 8 APPEALS A RISE FROM THE RESPECTIVE ORDERS OF THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (APPEALS) ( CIT(A) ) AGAINST DIFFERENT ASSESSMENT YEARS. 2. THE CAPTIONED ASSESSEE S HAVE SOUGHT TO WITHDRAW THE APPEALS LISTED ABOVE ON THE GROUND THAT THEY HAVE OPTED TO AVAIL BENEFITS OF VIVAD SE VISHWAS SCHEME, 2020 (VSV) . WHEN THE MATTER WAS CALLED FOR HEARING, THE LD. COUNSELS FOR THE ASSESSEE AT THE OUTSET H AVE SUBMITTED THAT THEY DO NOT SEEK TO PURSUE THE SAID APPEALS OWING TO EXERCISE OF OPTION FOR AVAILING VSV SCHEME AND CONSEQUE NTLY REQUESTED THAT THEIR APPLICATIONS FOR WITHDRAWAL OF APPEALS MAY PLEASE BE GRANTED. REFERENCE WAS ALSO MADE T O WRITTEN REQUESTS IN THIS REGARD. 3. THE LD. DEPARTMENTAL REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE REVENUE STATED THAT HE HAS NO OBJECTION TO WITHDRAW THE APP EALS IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES NARRATED ON BEHALF OF THE ASSESSEE. 4. IN THE LIGHT OF ORAL/WRITTEN REQUEST S MADE ON BEHALF OF THE CAPTIONED PARTIES, ALL THE APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. HOWEVER, IN THE EVENT, THE ASSESSEE FAILS TO AVAIL THE BENEFIT O F VSV SCHEME FOR ANY BONAFIDE REASONS , THEN THE ASSESSEE CONCERNED WILL BE AT LIBERTY TO SEEK RESTORATION OF ORIGINAL APPEALS FOR HEARING BEFORE ITAT IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. 5. IN THE RESULT, ALL CAPTIONED APPEALS ARE DISMISSED AS WITHDRAWN. SD/ - SD/ - ( MAHAVIR PRASAD ) (WASEEM AHMED ) JUDICIAL MEMBER ACCOUNTANT MEMBER AHMEDABAD: DATED 11 / 1 2 / 20 20 (TRU E COPY) THIS ORDE R PRONOUNCED ON 11 / 1 2 /20 20