PAWANS SPECIALITIES PVT. LTD., Jaipur V. ACIT, Jaipur

ITA 809/JPR/2016

• Counselvise Citation: [2017] 130 COUNSELVISE.COM (IT) 5576 (ITAT-JAIPUR)
• Duration Of Justice: 5 month(s) 2 day(s)
• Appeal Type: Income Tax Appeal
• Pronouncement Date: 15-02-2017
• Appeal Filed By: Assessee
• Order Result: Allowed
• Bench Allotted: SMC
• Assessment Year: 2011-2012
• Appeal Filed On: 12-09-2016
• Result in Favour of: Assessee
• Court: TRIBUNAL
• Department Lawyers: POONAM RAI DCIT DR DHK
• Keywords: Recovery proceedings; Business income; Onus to prove
• Section: 28

Judgement Text

VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ U;K;IHB] T;IQJ IN THE INCOME TAX APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, JAIPUR BENCHES (SMC), JAIPUR JH HKKXPUN] YS[KK LNL; DS LE{K BEFORE: SHRI BHAGCHAND, ACCOUNTANT MEMBER VK;DJ VIHY LA-@ ITA NO. 809/JP/2016 FU/KZKJ.K O'K Z@ ASSESSMENT YEAR : 2011-12 M/S. PAWAN SPECIALITIES (P) LTD. 4-THA-13, JAWAHAR NAGAR ,JAIPUR CUKE VS. THE ACIT CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR LFKK;H YS[KK LA-@THVKBZVKJ LA-@ PAN/GIR NO .: ABPPA 5398 F VIHYKFKHZ@ APPELLANT IZR;FKHZ@ RESPONDENT FU/KZKFJRH DH VKSJ LS@ ASSESSEE BY: SHRI MANISH AGARWAL , CA JKTLO DH VKSJ LS@ REVENUE BY :SMT. POONAM RAI, DCIT- DR LQUOKBZ DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF HEARING : 14/02/2017 ?KKS'K .KK DH RKJH[K@ DATE OF PRONOUNCEMENT : 15 /02/2017 VKNS'K@ ORDER PER BHAGCHAND, AM THE ASSESSEE HAS FILED AN APPEAL AGAINST THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A), JAIPUR DATED 27-06-2016 FOR THE ASSESSMENT YEAR 20 11-12 RAISING THEREIN GROUNDS OF APPEAL AS UNDER:- 1. THAT THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN LAW AS WELL AS ON FACTS IN CONFIRMING THE ADDITION WITHOUT CONSIDERING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE . 2 THAT THE LD. CIT(A) HAS ERRED IN MAKING AN ADDITION OF RS. 4,77,500/- FOR DISALLOWANCE OF L OSS OF GOODS BY THEFT IGNORING THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTAN CES OF THE CASE. THE SAME DESERVES TO BE DELETED. ITA NO. 809/JP/2016 M/S. PAWAN SPECIALITIES (P) LTD. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR 2 2.1 APROPOS GROUND NO. 1 AND 2 OF THE ASSESSEE, THE FACTS AS EMERGES FROM THE ORDER OF THE LD. CIT(A) IS AS UNDER:- 3.3 I HAVE PERUSED THE FACTS OF THE CASE, THE ASSESSMENT ORDER AND THE SUBMISSIONS OF THE APPELLA NT. THE ASSESSEE HAD CLAIMED LOSS OF GOODS BY THEFT FOR AMO UNTING TO RS. 4,7,500/-. IN THE ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS, THE A SSESSING OFFICER HAD CALLED FOR THE DETAILS WHICH HAVE NOT B EEN PROVIDED. IT WAS CLAIMED THAT THE COMPANY HAS INVES TIGATED AND FOUND THE FRAUD OF TATA SKY VOUCHERS /COUPON ON THE SUPPLIER COMPANY. IT WAS FURTHER SUBMITTED THAT THE FRAUD WAS DELETED BY THE COMPANYS INTERNAL CONTROL DEPAR TMENT AND THEY HAVE MADE A DETAILED LIST OF FRAUDS. THE A SSESSEE RECORDS WERE CALLED FOR AND IT IS SEEN THAT A STATE MENT SHOWING THE CALCULATION OF RS. 4,77,500/- WAS FILED BEFORE THE ASSESSING OFFICER, NO FURTHER DETAILS OR CONFIR MATIONS FROM THE COMPANY SUPPLYING THE COUPONS WAS FILED. N O FIR OR ANY OTHER PROCEEDINGS HAVE BEEN LAUNCHED. EVEN I N THE PRESENT PROCEEDINGS, NO FURTHER DETAILS RELATING TO THIS FRAUD WERE FILED. ASSESSING OFFICER HAS PLACED RELIANCE O N SHIV NARAIN KARMENDRA NARAIN VS. CIT 193 CTR 561 AND 56 ITR 1 (SC). AS NO SATISFACTORY DETAILS OF THE FRAUD LEA DING TO THE LOSS CLAIMED WERE FILED EITHER BEFORE THE ASSESSING OFFICER OR IN THE PRESENT PROCEEDINGS, THE SAME CANNOT BE ALLO WED. THE ASSESSING OFFICERS STAND ON THE ISSUE IS CONFIRMED . GROUND OF APPEAL IS DISMISSED. 2.2 DURING THE COURSE OF HEARING, THE LD. AR OF ASS ESSEE PRAYED FOR DELETION OF ADDITION OF RS. 4,77,500/- FOR WHICH TH E LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE FILED THE FOLLOWING WRITTEN SUBMISSION. UNDER ALL THESE GROUNDS OF APPEAL, THE ASSESSEE H AS COLLECTIVELY CHALLENGED THE ACTION OF LD. CIT(A) IN SUSTAINING THE ADDITION OF RS. 4,77,500/- MADE BY LD. AO BY DISALL OWING THE LOSS CLAIMED BY ASSESSEE ON ACCOUNT OF LOSS OF GOODS BY THEFT. ITA NO. 809/JP/2016 M/S. PAWAN SPECIALITIES (P) LTD. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR 3 BRIEF FACTS PERTAINING TO THESE GROUNDS OF APPEAL A RE THAT, DURING THE YEAR UNDER APPEAL, UPON INVESTIGATION, THE ASSE SSEE COMPANYS INTERNAL CONTROL DEPARTMENT DETECTED A FRAUD WHICH WAS COMMI TTED BY SOME OF ITS EMPLOYEES. THEREIN, IT WAS FOUND THAT A FRAUD OF RS . 4,77,500/- OF TATA SKY VOUCHERS / COUPON (TRANSFERABLE THROUGH MOBILE) HAS BEEN COMMITTED ON THE BASIS OF RECORDS AVAILABLE FROM THE SUPPLIER COMPANY. DURING THE COURSE OF ASSESSMENT PROCEEDINGS, THE ASSESSEE PROD UCED A DETAILED LIST OF THE INSTANCES WHERE LOSS HAD OCCURRED ON ACCOUNT OF SUCH FRAUD / THEFT. HOWEVER, THE LD. AO DISALLOWED THE LOSS SO CLAIMED BY ASSESSEE, MERELY ON THE GROUND THAT NO LEGAL ACTION WAS TAKEN AGAINS T THE PERSONS WHO HAD COMMITTED THE FRAUD. THE LD. AO ALLEGED THAT THE AS SESSEE CANNOT BE ALLOWED TO MAKE SUCH ENTRY OF LOSS IN BOOKS OF ACCO UNT IN THE ABSENCE OF ANY ACTION TAKEN BY ASSESSEE FOR RECOVERY OF THE AM OUNT EMBEZZLED, IN SUPPORT OF WHICH, LD. AO PLACED RELIANCE ON THE JUD GMENT OF HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF ASSOCIATED BANKING COR PORATION OF INDIA LTD. VS. CIT (SC) REPORTED IN 56 ITR 1. IN THIS REG ARD IT IS HUMBLY SUBMITTED THAT IT IS AN ADMITTED POSITION THAT THEF T / FRAUD HAD INDEED HAS TAKEN PLACE IN THE ASSESSEE COMPANY AND THE LD. AO HAS NOWHERE DOUBTED THE FACT OF FRAUD. MEANING THEREBY, THAT THE LD. AO HAS MADE THE IMPUGNED DISALLOWANCE NOT BECAUSE THE ASSESSEE COUL D NOT ESTABLISH THE FACT OF FRAUD, BUT MERELY BECAUSE THE ASSESSEE COUL D NOT PRODUCE COPY OF FIRST INFORMATION REPORT (FIR) OR ANY OTHER EVIDENC E OF LEGAL ACTION TAKEN BY ASSESSEE AGAINST THE EMPLOYEES COMMITTING FRAUD. IT IS SUBMITTED THAT MERELY BECAUSE THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT LODGE FIR OR TAKE ANY OTHER ACTION AGAINST THE CONCERNED EMPLOYEES, THE GENUINE LOSS C LAIMED BY ASSESSEE CANNOT BE DISALLOWED. NON-ACTION AGAINST THOSE EMPL OYEES CANNOT BRING THE GENUINENESS OF THE LOSS IN QUESTION, AND MORE P ARTICULARLY WHEN THE FACT OF LOSS ON ACCOUNT OF FRAUD IS AN ADMITTED POS ITION, THE GENUINENESS THEREOF AUTOMATICALLY GETS ESTABLISHED. THE JUDGMEN T OF HONBLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF ASSOCIATED BANKING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. VS. CIT (SC) [56 ITR 1] WHICH HAS BEEN RELIED UPON BY T HE LD. AO HAS BEEN RENDERED IN DIFFERENT SET OF CIRCUMSTANCES AND IS C LEARLY DISTINGUISHABLE ON FACTS OF THE CASE. IN THAT CASE, EMBEZZLEMENT OF HU GE AMOUNT HAD TAKEN PLACE IN A BANKING COMPANY WHICH HAD BEEN WOUND UP AND WAS UNDER LIQUIDATION. IN THAT CASE IT WAS FOUND THAT THERE W ERE REASONABLE CHANCES OF RECOVERY BY LIQUIDATOR, OF THE EMBEZZLED AMOUNT AND THEREFORE, IT WAS HELD THAT SO LONG AS THERE WAS A REASONABLE PROSPEC T OF RECOVERING THE AMOUNTS EMBEZZLED BY THE BANK, TRADING LOSS IN A CO MMERCIAL SENSE MAY NOT BE DEEMED TO HAVE RESULTED.HOWEVER, IN THE PRES ENT CASE THE LD. AO HAS FAILED TO ESTABLISH THAT THERE WERE REASONABLE PROSPECT OF RECOVERING THE EMBEZZLED AMOUNT. IN THE INSTANT CASE, THE LD. AO HAS NOT DOUBTED THE GENUINENESS OF THE FRAUD BUT HAS MERELY ALLEGED THA T THE ASSESSEE DID NOT MAKE EFFORT FOR RECOVERY OF THE AMOUNT, HOWEVER, HE FAILED TO ESTABLISH THAT THERE WAS REASONABLE PROSPECTS OF RECOVERY OF THE AMOUNT EMBEZZLED, THE BURDEN TO PROVE WHICH WAS CLEARLY UPON HIM. IT WAS SUBMITTED BEFORE THE LD. AO THAT LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE CONCERNED EMPLOYEES WAS NOT TAKEN SINCE THERE WAS NO HOPE OF RECOVERY OF THE AM OUNT. IT IS PERTINENT TO ITA NO. 809/JP/2016 M/S. PAWAN SPECIALITIES (P) LTD. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR 4 MENTION HERE THAT, THE AFORESAID JUDGMENT OF THE HO NBLE SUPREME COURT HAS BEEN CONSIDERED BY CBDT WHO THERE AFTER, ISSUED A CLARIFICATION THROUGH CIRCULAR NO. 35D(XLVII-20) [F .NO. 10/48/65-IT (AI)] DATED 24.11.1965 (COPY ENCLOSED), WHICH PROVI DES AS UNDER: CIRCULAR NO. 35D(XLVII-20) [F. NO. 10/48/65-IT(AI)] LOSS BY EMBEZZLEMENT BY EMPLOYEESDEDUCTIBILITY THE REOF BUSINESS INCOME SECTIONS 29, A REFERENCE IS INVITED TO THE INSTRUCTIONS ON THE A BOVE SUBJECT CONTAINED IN BOARD'S CIRCULAR NO. 25 OF 193 9 AND CIRCULAR NO. 13 OF 1944. IN THESE CIRCULARS IT WAS CLARIFIED THAT LOSSES ARISING DUE TO EMBEZZLEMENT OF EMPLOYEES OR DUE TO NEGLIGEN CE OF EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE ALLOWED IF THE LOSS TOOK PLACE IN THE NORMAL COURSE OF BUSINESS AND THE AMOUNT INVOLVED WAS NECE SSARILY KEPT FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE BUSINESS IN THE PLACE FROM W HICH IT WAS LOST. SINCE THE ABOVE CIRCULARS WERE ISSUED, THE SUPREME COURT HAS FURTHER CONSIDERED THE MATTER AND LAID DOWN THE LAW IN THIS REGARD IN THE FOLLOWING TWO CASES : (1) BADRI DAS DAGA VS. CIT (1958) 34 ITR 10 (SC) : TC 14R.202. (2) ASSOCIATED BANKING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. VS . CIT (1965) 56 ITR 1 (SC) IN THE FIRST CASE, THE SUPREME COURT HAS AFFIRMED T HE VIEW THAT THE LOSS RESULTING FROM EMBEZZLEMENT BY AN EMPLOYEE OR AGENT OF A BUSINESS IS ADMISSIBLE AS A DEDUCTION UNDER S. 10(1 ) OF THE IT ACT, 1922 (CORRESPONDING TO S. 28 OF THE IT ACT, 1961) I F IT ARISES OUT OF THE CARRYING ON OF THE BUSINESS AND IS INCIDENTAL TO IT . IN THE SECOND CASE THE DECISION IS THAT LOSS MUST BE DEEMED TO HAVE AR ISEN ONLY WHEN THE EMPLOYER COMES TO KNOW ABOUT IT AND REALISES THAT T HE AMOUNTS EMBEZZLED CANNOT BE RECOVERED. 2. IN THE LIGHT OF THE ABOVE DECISIONS OF THE SUPRE ME COURT, THE LEGAL POSITION NOW IS THAT LOSS BY EMBEZZLEMENT BY EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE RELATED AS INCIDENTAL TO A BUSINESS AND THIS LOS S SHOULD BE ALLOWED AS DEDUCTION IN THE YEAR IN WHICH IT IS DISCOVERED THUS, NOW IT IS A SETTLED POSITION THAT LOSS BY EMB EZZLEMENT BY EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE RELATED AS INCIDENTAL TO A BUSI NESS AND THIS LOSS SHOULD BE ALLOWED AS DEDUCTION IN THE YEAR IN WHICH IT IS DIS COVERED. ANOTHER DISTINGUISHING FEATURE TO BE NOTICED IS THA T THE AFORESAID JUDGMENT WAS RENDERED WITH RESPECT TO THE PROVISION S OF INCOME TAX ACT, ITA NO. 809/JP/2016 M/S. PAWAN SPECIALITIES (P) LTD. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR 5 1922 , WHEREAS, THE PRESENT CASE IS GOVERNED BY THE PRO VISIONS OF INCOME TAX ACT, 1961 . THE AFORESAID CIRCULAR WAS TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION BY THE HONBLE ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT IN THE CASE OF SHITLA PRASAD SHYAM LAL VS. CIT REPORTED IN 188 ITR 514 WHEREIN THE COURT HAS HELD AS UNDER: SIMPLY BECAUSE A CRIMINAL CASE WAS PENDING OR A CIV IL SUIT HAD NOT BEEN FILED, THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT BE LEFT UNDETERMINED. MOREOVER, CIRCULAR NO. 35D(XLVII-20) [F. NO. 10/48/65-IT(AI)] DATED 24.11.1965 STATED THAT LOSS BY EMBEZZLEMENT BY EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE TREATED AS INCI DENTAL TO THE BUSINESS AND THE LOSS SHOULD BE ALLOWED IN THE YEAR IN WHICH IT WAS DISCOVERED. THEREFORE, THE TRIBUNAL WAS NOT JUSTIF IED IN HOLDING THAT THE ASSESSEES CLAIM OF LOSS WAS PREMATURE. [PAGE 516] FURTHER, IN THE CASE OF BOMBAY FORGINGS PVT. LTD. VS. CIT REPORTED IN ( 1994) 206 ITR 562 , THE HONBLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT HELD THAT: IT WAS AN ADMITTED POSITION THAT THE EMBEZZLEMENT H AD TAKEN PLACE DURING THE RELEVANT PREVIOUS YEAR AND T HE SAME WAS DULY REFLECTED IN THE BOOKS OF ACCOUNT BY OMISSION OF THE VALUE OF SUCH GOODS FROM THE SALES AS WELL AS CLOSING STOCK OF THE ASSESSEE IN PREPARATION OF THE FINAL ACCOUNTS. IN A SITUATIO N LIKE THIS, SO FAR AS LOSS WAS CONCERNED, DETECTION WAS NOT RELEVANT. THE LOSS CAUSED TO THE ASSESSEE BY EMBEZZLEMENT DURING THE RELEVANT PREVIOUS YEAR WAS ALLOWABLE AS DEDUCTION IN THE COMPUTATION OF TH E INCOME IN THAT PREVIOUS YEAR ITSELF. (P. 566, C, D) SIMILARLY, THE HONBLE GUJARAT HIGH COURT IN THE CA SE OF KAMLA COTTON CO. VS. CIT REPORTED IN ( 1997) 226 ITR 605 HAS HELD THAT: THE REQUIREMENT THAT A DEBT HAS BECOME BAD OR IRRECOVERABLE DOES NOT MEAN THAT THE DEPARTMENT CAN INSIST UPON DEMONSTRATIVE AND INFALLIBLE PROOF THAT THE DEBT HA D BECOME BAD. IT IS NOT COMPULSORY FOR THE ASSESSEE TO TAKE LEGAL PROCE EDINGS AGAINST THE DEBTOR FOR RECOVERY OF THE CLAIM BEFORE WRITING IT OFF AS A BAD DEBT. WHEN A CREDITOR BONA FIDE WRITES OFF A DEBT BECAUSE THERE APPEARS NO CHANCE OF ITS RECOVERY IN THE FORESEEABLE FUTURE OR WHERE THE RECOVERY PROCEEDINGS WOULD BE SO CUMBERSOME AND EXPENSIVE AS TO OUTWEIGH ANY ADVANTAGE OF INSTITUTING ANY RECOVERY PROCEEDIN GS, THE ASSESSEE DISCHARGES THE ONUS AND WOULD BE ENTITLED TO CLAIM DEDUCTION OF THE BAD DEBT UNDER CLAUSE (VII) OF SECTION 36(1) OF THE INCOME TAX ACT, 1961. THUS, IN LIGHT OF THE ABOVE IT BECOMES CLEAR MERELY ON ACCOUNT OF NON- ACTION AGAINST EMPLOYEES FOR EMBEZZLEMENT, THE UNDO UBTED GENUINENESS OF THE LOSS CLAIMED BY ASSESSEE ON ACCOUNT OF SUCH EMBEZZL EMENT CANNOT BE ITA NO. 809/JP/2016 M/S. PAWAN SPECIALITIES (P) LTD. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR 6 DISALLOWED. THEREFORE, IT IS HUMBLY PRAYED THAT THE ADDITION OF RS. 4,77,500/- MAY PLEASE BE DELETED. 2.3 ON THE OTHER HAND, THE LD. DR RELIED ON THE ORDERS OF THE AUTHORITIES BELOW. 2.4 I HAVE HEARD THE RIVAL CONTENTIONS AND PERUSED THE MATERIALS AVAILABLE ON RECORD. IT IS NOTED FROM THE RECORDS T HAT THE ASSESSEE HAD CLAIMED LOSS OF GOODS (I.E. TATA SKY VOUCHERS / COU PON OF THE SUPPLIER COMPANY) BY THEFT. HOWEVER, IN THE ASSESSMENT PRO CEEDINGS, THE AO REQUIRED THE JUSTIFICATION IN THIS REGARD OR ALSO TO PRODUCE THE COPY OF THE FIR FOR THE LEGAL ACTION TAKEN BY THE ASSESSEE WHIC H THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT PRODUCED BEFORE THE AO. THE AO FOR WANT OF THE EVIDENCE OR JUSTIFICATION AS TO THE THEFT OF THE GOODS DISALLOW ED THE CLAIM OF RS. 4,77,500/- MADE BY THE ASSESSEE WHICH HAS BEEN CONF IRMED BY THE LD. CIT(A) IN FIRST APPEAL. IN THE APPELLATE PROCEEDING S, THE LD. AR OF THE PRAYED THAT IT IS AN ADMITTED POSITION THAT THEFT/ FRAUD HAD INDEED TAKEN PLACE IN THE ASSESSEE COMPANY AND THE AO HAD NOWHER E DOUBTED THE FACT OF FRAUD BUT HE DISALLOWED THE CLAIM OF THE ASSESSE E FOR THE REASON THAT THE ASSESSEE COULD NOT ESTABLISH THE FACT OF FRAUD LIKE NON- PRODUCTION OF COPY OF FIR AND NOT TAKING ANY LEGAL ACTION AGAINST THE EMPLOYEE WHO WAS INVOLVED IN THIS ACTIVITY OF FRAUD. THE LD. AR FURT HER SUBMITTED THAT NON- ACTION AGAINST THOSE EMPLOYEES CANNOT BRING THE GEN UINENESS OF THE LOSS IN ITA NO. 809/JP/2016 M/S. PAWAN SPECIALITIES (P) LTD. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR 7 QUESTION AND MORE PARTICULARLY WHEN THE FACT OF LOS S ON ACCOUNT OF FRAUD IS AN ADMITTED POSITION AND THUS THE GENUINEN ESS THEREOF AUTOMATICALLY GETS ESTABLISHED. THE LD. AR OF THE A SSESSEE RELIED ON DECISION OF HON'BLE SUPREME COURT IN THE CASE OF A SSOCIATED BANKING OF INDIA LTD. VS. CIT (SUPRA). FURTHER THE LD. AR OF T HE ASSESSEE TOOK RESORT OF CBDT CIRCULAR NO.25 OF 1939 AND CIRCULAR NO. 13 OF 1994 WHEREIN IT WAS CLARIFIED THAT LOSSES ARISING DUE TO EMBEZZLEME NT OF EMPLOYEES OR DUE TO NEGLIGENCE OF EMPLOYEES SHOULD BE ALLOWED IF THE LOSS TOOK PLACE IN THE NORMAL COURSE OF BUSINESS AND THE AMOUNT INVOLVED W AS NECESSARILY KEPT FOR THE PURPOSE OF THE BUSINESS IN THE PLACE FROM W HICH IT WAS LOST. THE HON'BLE SUPREME COURT HAS FURTHER CONSIDERED THE M ATTER AND LAID DOWN THE LAW IN THIS REGARD IN THE FOLLOWING TWO CASES. (1) BADRI DAS DAGA VS. CIT (1958) 34 ITR 10 (SC) : TC 14R.202. (2) ASSOCIATED BANKING CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. VS . CIT (1965) 56 ITR 1 (SC) ON THE ENQUIRY BY THE BENCH, IT WAS CONFIRMED BY TH E LD. AR OF THE ASSESSEE THAT THE TURNOVER OF THE ASSESSEE COMPANY IS MORE THAN RS. 1.00 CRORE. IT IS FURTHER NOTED THAT SUCH ISSUE HAS BEEN DECIDED BY THE HON'BLE COURTS IN FAVOUR OF THE ASSESSEE. (1) SHITLA PRASAD SHYAM LAL VS. CIT , 188 ITR 514 (ALL.) ITA NO. 809/JP/2016 M/S. PAWAN SPECIALITIES (P) LTD. VS. ACIT, CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR 8 (2) BOMBAY FORGINGS (P) LTD. VS.CIT 206 ITR 562 (BOM.) (3) KAMLA COTTON CO. VS. CIT 226 ITR 605 (GUJ.) IN VIEW OF THE ABOVE DELIBERATIONS, CASE LAWS AND T HE CBDT CIRCULAR RELIED ON (SUPRA), I DO NOT CONCUR WITH THE VIEWS O F THE LOWER AUTHORITIES ON THIS ISSUE. THUS THE APPEAL OF THE ASSESSEE IS A LLOWED. 3.0 IN THE RESULT, THE APPEAL FILED BY THE ASSESSEE IS ALLOWED. ORDER PRONOUNCED IN THE OPEN COURT ON 15 -02-20 17. SD/- HKKXPUN ( BHAGCHAND) YS[KK LNL;@ ACCOUNTANT MEMBER TK;IQJ@ JAIPUR FNUKAD@ DATED:- 15 /02/ 2017 *MISHRA VKNS'K DH IZFRFYFI VXZSF'KR@ COPY OF THE ORDER FORWARDED TO: 1. VIHYKFKHZ@ THE APPELLANT- M/S. PAWAN SPECIALITIES (P) LTD., JA IPUR 2. IZR;FKHZ@ THE RESPONDENT- THE ACIT,CIRCLE- 6, JAIPUR 3. VK;DJ VK;QDRVIHY@ CIT(A). 4. VK;DJ VK;QDR@ CIT, 5. FOHKKXH; IZFRFUF/K] VK;DJ VIHYH; VF/KDJ.K] T;IQJ@ DR, ITAT, JAIPUR 6. XKMZ QKBZY@ GUARD FILE (ITA NO. 809/JP/2016) VKNS'KKUQLKJ@ BY ORDER, LGK;D IATHDKJ @ ASSISTANT. REGISTRAR